SoCs Ratings

Here we have collected for your convenience the results of various benchmarks, both single-threaded and multi-threaded, all in one place, just select the one you need.

FP32 (float)

Dimensity 9300
MediaTek, November 2023
Compare
6110 Score
Dimensity 9300 Plus
MediaTek, May 2024
Compare
5870 Score
Dimensity 9200 Plus
MediaTek, May 2023
Compare
4286 Score
Snapdragon 8 Elite
Qualcomm, October 2024
Compare
3819 Score
Dimensity 9200
MediaTek, November 2022
Compare
3662 Score
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Qualcomm, November 2022
Compare
3411 Score
Exynos 2200
Samsung, January 2022
Compare
3172 Score
M2 iPad
Apple, June 2022
Compare
2860 Score
M1 iPad
Apple, November 2020
Compare
2669 Score
Tensor G4
Google, August 2024
Compare
2475 Score
Tensor G3
Google, October 2023
Compare
2463 Score
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Qualcomm, December 2021
Compare
2462 Score
Kirin 9000
HiSilicon, October 2020
Compare
2378 Score
Tensor
Google, October 2021
Compare
2213 Score
A17 Pro
Apple, September 2023
Compare
2146 Score
Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon, October 2020
Compare
2094 Score
Snapdragon 888 Plus
Qualcomm, June 2021
Compare
1890 Score
Dimensity 9000 Plus
MediaTek, July 2022
Compare
1827 Score
A18
Apple, September 2024
Compare
1825 Score
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
Qualcomm, March 2023
Compare
1817 Score
A16 Bionic
Apple, September 2022
Compare
1788 Score
Snapdragon 888
Qualcomm, December 2020
Compare
1754 Score
A15 Bionic
Apple, September 2021
Compare
1678 Score
Dimensity 9000
MediaTek, November 2021
Compare
1665 Score
Tensor G5
Google, August 2025
Compare
1567 Score
Exynos 2100
Samsung, December 2020
Compare
1499 Score
Dimensity 8200
MediaTek, December 2022
Compare
1413 Score
Snapdragon 865 Plus
Qualcomm, July 2020
Compare
1345 Score
Snapdragon 870
Qualcomm, January 2021
Compare
1345 Score
Dimensity 8100
MediaTek, March 2022
Compare
1335 Score
Snapdragon 865
Qualcomm, December 2019
Compare
1226 Score
Exynos 990
Samsung, October 2019
Compare
1149 Score
Tensor G2
Google, October 2022
Compare
1119 Score
A12Z Bionic
Apple, March 2020
Compare
1084 Score
Snapdragon 855 Plus
Qualcomm, July 2019
Compare
1057 Score
Exynos 1080
Samsung, November 2020
Compare
1044 Score
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
Qualcomm, May 2022
Compare
1033 Score
A12X Bionic
Apple, October 2018
Compare
1028 Score
Snapdragon 860
Qualcomm, April 2019
Compare
1015 Score
Dimensity 1200
MediaTek, January 2021
Compare
999 Score
Dimensity 1100
MediaTek, January 2021
Compare
999 Score
Dimensity 1000 Plus
MediaTek, May 2020
Compare
999 Score
Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm, December 2018
Compare
916 Score
Snapdragon 778G Plus
Qualcomm, October 2021
Compare
861 Score
Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm, December 2017
Compare
742 Score
Snapdragon 782G
Qualcomm, November 2022
Compare
737 Score
Snapdragon 780G
Qualcomm, March 2021
Compare
737 Score
Kirin 990
HiSilicon, October 2019
Compare
705 Score
Kirin 990 5G
HiSilicon, October 2019
Compare
705 Score
Dimensity 1080
MediaTek, October 2022
Compare
700 Score
Dimensity 7050
MediaTek, May 2023
Compare
700 Score
Dimensity 920
MediaTek, August 2021
Compare
698 Score
Kirin 990 4G
HiSilicon, October 2019
Compare
677 Score
A14 Bionic
Apple, September 2020
Compare
667 Score
Exynos 9825
Samsung, August 2019
Compare
664 Score
Exynos 1380
Samsung, February 2023
Compare
620 Score
Exynos 9820
Samsung, November 2018
Compare
619 Score
A13 Bionic
Apple, September 2019
Compare
616 Score
Dimensity 900
MediaTek, May 2021
Compare
609 Score
A12 Bionic
Apple, September 2018
Compare
588 Score
Snapdragon 765G
Qualcomm, December 2019
Compare
588 Score
Snapdragon 835
Qualcomm, November 2016
Compare
578 Score
Kirin 980
HiSilicon, August 2018
Compare
528 Score
Exynos 1280
Samsung, March 2022
Compare
497 Score
Snapdragon 690
Qualcomm, June 2020
Compare
496 Score
Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Qualcomm, September 2024
Compare
491 Score
Snapdragon 695
Qualcomm, October 2021
Compare
476 Score
Snapdragon 480 Plus
Qualcomm, October 2021
Compare
476 Score
T820
Unisoc, November 2022
Compare
444 Score
Snapdragon 750G
Qualcomm, September 2020
Compare
430 Score
Snapdragon 730G
Qualcomm, April 2019
Compare
430 Score
Snapdragon 480 5G
Qualcomm, January 2021
Compare
430 Score
Snapdragon 480
Qualcomm, January 2021
Compare
430 Score
Dimensity 820
MediaTek, May 2020
Compare
424 Score
A11 Bionic
Apple, September 2017
Compare
417 Score
Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
Qualcomm, October 2022
Compare
414 Score
Snapdragon 732G
Qualcomm, August 2020
Compare
414 Score
Snapdragon 720G
Qualcomm, January 2020
Compare
392 Score
Snapdragon 712
Qualcomm, February 2019
Compare
392 Score
Exynos 9810
Samsung, January 2018
Compare
377 Score
Snapdragon 710
Qualcomm, May 2018
Compare
376 Score
Snapdragon 670
Qualcomm, August 2018
Compare
365 Score
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Qualcomm, June 2023
Compare
359 Score
Snapdragon 730
Qualcomm, April 2019
Compare
351 Score
Snapdragon 821
Qualcomm, August 2016
Compare
341 Score
Dimensity 800
MediaTek, December 2019
Compare
339 Score
Dimensity 720
MediaTek, July 2020
Compare
333 Score
Dimensity 800U
MediaTek, August 2020
Compare
333 Score
Snapdragon 678
Qualcomm, December 2020
Compare
330 Score
Snapdragon 675
Qualcomm, October 2018
Compare
330 Score
Kirin 970
HiSilicon, September 2017
Compare
324 Score
Snapdragon 820
Qualcomm, November 2015
Compare
313 Score
T760
Unisoc, July 2024
Compare
313 Score
Snapdragon 680
Qualcomm, October 2021
Compare
290 Score
Helio G99
MediaTek, May 2022
Compare
275 Score
Kirin 960
HiSilicon, October 2016
Compare
260 Score
Exynos 980
Samsung, September 2019
Compare
257 Score
Dimensity 930
MediaTek, May 2022
Compare
254 Score
Dimensity 7020
MediaTek, May 2023
Compare
254 Score
Helio G95
MediaTek, September 2020
Compare
254 Score
Snapdragon 662
Qualcomm, January 2020
Compare
248 Score
A10 Fusion
Apple, September 2016
Compare
244 Score
A9
Apple, September 2015
Compare
244 Score
Exynos 8890
Samsung, November 2015
Compare
244 Score
Kirin 810
HiSilicon, June 2019
Compare
241 Score
Dimensity 810
MediaTek, August 2021
Compare
238 Score
Dimensity 700
MediaTek, November 2020
Compare
238 Score
Snapdragon 665
Qualcomm, April 2019
Compare
238 Score
Exynos 1330
Samsung, February 2023
Compare
235 Score
Helio G90T
MediaTek, July 2019
Compare
235 Score
Snapdragon 660
Qualcomm, May 2017
Compare
221 Score
Helio X30
MediaTek, February 2017
Compare
213 Score
Helio G90
MediaTek, July 2019
Compare
203 Score
Exynos 7420
Samsung, April 2015
Compare
193 Score
Snapdragon 636
Qualcomm, October 2017
Compare
188 Score
Snapdragon 630
Qualcomm, May 2017
Compare
163 Score
Helio P95
MediaTek, February 2020
Compare
158 Score
Helio P90
MediaTek, November 2018
Compare
158 Score
Snapdragon 650
Qualcomm, February 2015
Compare
156 Score
Snapdragon 460
Qualcomm, January 2020
Compare
156 Score
Snapdragon 652
Qualcomm, February 2015
Compare
150 Score
Kirin 710
HiSilicon, July 2018
Compare
131 Score
Kirin 710F
HiSilicon, January 2019
Compare
131 Score
Kirin 710A
HiSilicon, June 2020
Compare
131 Score
Snapdragon 632
Qualcomm, June 2018
Compare
122 Score
Snapdragon 625
Qualcomm, February 2016
Compare
122 Score
Kirin 950
HiSilicon, November 2015
Compare
117 Score
Kirin 955
HiSilicon, April 2016
Compare
113 Score
Snapdragon 450
Qualcomm, June 2017
Compare
113 Score
Tiger T615
Unisoc, August 2024
Compare
106 Score
Tiger T616
Unisoc, January 2021
Compare
98 Score
Helio G88
MediaTek, June 2021
Compare
98 Score
Helio G85
MediaTek, April 2020
Compare
98 Score
Helio P70
MediaTek, October 2018
Compare
95 Score
Helio G91
MediaTek, June 2024
Compare
94 Score
Helio G81
MediaTek, August 2024
Compare
93 Score
Helio G80
MediaTek, February 2020
Compare
89 Score
Exynos 9610
Samsung, March 2018
Compare
89 Score
Exynos 9609
Samsung, May 2019
Compare
89 Score
Exynos 7880
Samsung, January 2017
Compare
89 Score
Helio P60
MediaTek, February 2018
Compare
88 Score
Tiger T618
Unisoc, August 2019
Compare
83 Score
Tiger T700
Unisoc, March 2021
Compare
83 Score
T606
Unisoc, September 2021
Compare
81 Score
Helio G70
MediaTek, January 2020
Compare
80 Score
Helio P65
MediaTek, June 2019
Compare
80 Score
Tiger T612
Unisoc, May 2022
Compare
76 Score
Exynos 7885
Samsung, February 2018
Compare
71 Score
SC9863A
Unisoc, November 2018
Compare
69 Score
Tiger T610
Unisoc, June 2019
Compare
59 Score