Qualcomm Snapdragon 888

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 mobile chipset review

Snapdragon 888 in 2026: Power Remains, Efficiency Is Gone

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 still provides high speeds in applications and games. Its performance is sufficient for multitasking, photo processing, and most modern projects. However, the chip consumes a lot of energy, heats up significantly, and quickly throttles frequencies in thin smartphones with inadequate cooling.

Therefore, it makes no sense to evaluate the Snapdragon 888 separately from a specific device. One smartphone may maintain frequencies for a relatively long time, while another begins to throttle after just a few minutes of gaming. Now, in addition to heating, there’s another risk-the worn batteries of most surviving devices.

Short Conclusion

The Snapdragon 888 still handles everyday tasks, photo processing, emulation, and most Android games. In short tests, it outperforms many modern budget platforms.

However, purchasing a smartphone solely because of the chip's former flagship status is not worth it. New mid-range processors may fall short in peak results but run cooler, maintain frequencies longer, and consume battery power more efficiently.

A smartphone with the Snapdragon 888 should be considered if:

  • the price is significantly lower than that of newer models;
  • the battery retains a normal capacity or can be replaced;
  • the device is not known for aggressive throttling;
  • you are satisfied with the remaining support lifespan and Android version.

CPU Performance

The Snapdragon 888 CPU consists of one powerful Cortex-X1 core, three Cortex-A78 cores, and four efficient Cortex-A55 cores. Today, this configuration is sufficient for a fast interface, browser, messaging apps, and most productivity applications.

Limitations appear during prolonged rendering, video processing, emulation, and extended gaming. In such tasks, the results depend not only on the processor itself but also on cooling, firmware, and power settings.

Geekbench 6 in Specific Smartphones

Smartphone Single Core All Cores
Sony Xperia 1 III 1495 3532
ASUS ROG Phone 5 Ultimate 1380 3469
OnePlus 9 1233 3575
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 1222 3276

These are approximate results based on user testing: an individual smartphone may score higher or lower. Factors affecting the outcome include temperature, firmware, Android version, background applications, and active power profile.

The differences between models illustrate how much the Snapdragon 888's performance depends on the specific device. A high score in one short run does not guarantee that the smartphone will maintain that speed after ten or twenty minutes of load.

AnTuTu 10

Smartphone AnTuTu 10
Sony Xperia 1 III 889,100
ASUS ROG Phone 5 883,000
OnePlus 9 880,900
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 868,529
Xiaomi Mi 11 806,139

In AnTuTu 10, smartphones with the Snapdragon 888 typically score between 800,000 and 900,000 points. The results depend on memory, cooling, firmware, and power mode.

These figures cannot be directly compared with AnTuTu 11 as the new version uses a different methodology and evaluation scale.

Graphics and Gaming

Adreno 660 has aged better than the CPU part of the Snapdragon 888. Most mobile games run at high settings, especially those designed for flagship smartphones from the early 2020s.

In newer demanding games, maximum graphics settings can lead to overheating and unstable frame rates. In the first few minutes, Snapdragon 888 delivers high FPS, but after warming up, it reduces frequencies, causing drops.

In practice:

  • Competitive games generally run without serious problems;
  • In heavy projects, it's better to forgo maximum graphics;
  • Stable 60 frames per second depend on cooling;
  • Extended gaming quickly depletes the battery;
  • An external cooler can significantly reduce drops.

ROG Phone 5 maintains frequencies longer than most thin flagship smartphones, but its large body does not make the Snapdragon 888 economical.

Cameras and Multimedia

The Spectra 580 image processing processor supports simultaneous operation of multiple cameras, high-resolution video recording, and 10-bit HDR.

However, having the same processor does not mean having the same cameras. Sony Xperia 1 III, Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and OnePlus 9 all use the Snapdragon 888 but vary significantly in sensors, optics, and processing algorithms. The quality of photos should be assessed based on the specific model rather than the SoC's capabilities on paper.

Heating and Battery Life

The main drawback of the Snapdragon 888 is not just the maximum temperature itself, but the rapid drop in performance after heating. In a short test, the smartphone shows a high score, but during prolonged gaming or video recording, it throttles frequencies to maintain an acceptable temperature.

Now, with heating, there is also the issue of battery wear. An old battery discharges faster, heats up more, and experiences more significant drops under load. Even the new Snapdragon 888 was not known for high battery life, and a worn battery further reduces operational time.

Before purchasing, it’s worth checking:

  • the state of the battery;
  • heating during gaming or video recording;
  • performance after 15-20 minutes of load;
  • stability of mobile and Wi-Fi networks;
  • charging function and USB port.

A single AnTuTu run is insufficient for such a check.

Should You Buy a Smartphone with Snapdragon 888

The Snapdragon 888 is still fast, but buying a smartphone with it blindly is no longer advisable. Such a device may be considered for gaming, emulation, or a good camera-but only at a low price.

If prices are similar, it’s better to choose a newer processor. Even if the new chip falls short in a short test, it usually maintains frequencies longer, runs cooler, and conserves battery power more effectively.

The Snapdragon 888 has not aged in terms of performance. It has aged in terms of efficiency. In a smartphone with decent cooling and at a low price, this processor can still justify the purchase. In a thin case with a worn battery, its advantages are quickly eroded by heating and throttling.

Basic

Label Name
Qualcomm
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Launch Date
December 2020
Model Name
SM8350
Architecture
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores
8
Technology
5 nm
Frequency
2840 MHz

GPU Specifications

GPU name
Adreno 660
GPU frequency
840 MHz
FLOPS
1.72 TFLOPS
Shading units
512
Execution units
2
OpenCL version
2.0
Vulkan version
1.1
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

Download speed
Up to 2500 Mbps
4G support
LTE Cat. 22
Bluetooth
5.2
Wi-Fi
6
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR5
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

L2 Cache
1 MB
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Storage type
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video playback
8K at 30FPS
TDP
10 W
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 780

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
1481
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
3794
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
717
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
2413
FP32 (float)
Score
1754
AiTuTu 3
Score
503622

Phones with Snapdragon 888

Asus ZenFone 8
Asus ZenFone 8
Honor X40 GT
Honor X40 GT
Huawei P50 Pro (SDM888)
Huawei P50 Pro (SDM888)
Leica Leitz Phone 1
Leica Leitz Phone 1
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
OnePlus 9RT 5G
OnePlus 9RT 5G
Oppo Find N
Oppo Find N
Oppo Find X5
Oppo Find X5
Realme GT 5G
Realme GT 5G
Redmagic 6R
Redmagic 6R
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Sharp Aquos R6
Sharp Aquos R6
Sony Xperia 1 III
Sony Xperia 1 III
Sony Xperia 5 III
Sony Xperia 5 III
Sony Xperia Pro-I
Sony Xperia Pro-I
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
Xiaomi Mi 11
Xiaomi Mi 11
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R

Tablets with Snapdragon 888

Huawei MatePad Air
Huawei MatePad Air
Infinix Xpad GT
Infinix Xpad GT
Leia Lume Pad 2
Leia Lume Pad 2
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Microsoft Surface Duo 2

Comparison of Devices with Snapdragon 888

3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
8231
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
8094
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
8056
Sharp Aquos R6
8022
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
7877
Huawei P50 Pro (SDM888)
6778
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
6230
Huawei P50 Pro (SDM888)
5712
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
9612
Sony Xperia 1 III
9486
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
9354
Redmagic 6R
9354
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
9118
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
8366
Asus ZenFone 8
8175
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
7855
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
7647
Xiaomi Mi 11
7583
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Asus ZenFone 8
11106
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
10898
Redmagic 6R
10898
Realme GT 5G
10423
Xiaomi Mi 11
9368
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
9111
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
9085
Sony Xperia 1 III
8570
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
8401
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
529
Redmagic 6R
521
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
520
Asus ZenFone 8
517
Leia Lume Pad 2
510
Realme GT 5G
507
Honor X40 GT
507
OnePlus 9RT 5G
506
Huawei P50 Pro (SDM888)
506
Sony Xperia 1 III
505
Leica Leitz Phone 1
505
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
505
Oppo Find X5
505
Huawei MatePad Air
505
Infinix Xpad GT
505
Sony Xperia Pro-I
502
Oppo Find N
496
Xiaomi Mi 11
493
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
487
Sony Xperia 5 III
486
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
484
Sharp Aquos R6
462
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
441
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
441
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
303
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
293
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Find N
5890
Oppo Find X5
5824
OnePlus 9RT 5G
5821
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
5806
Realme GT 5G
5794
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
5792
Redmagic 6R
5792
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
5777
Huawei P50 Pro (SDM888)
5709
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
5653
Asus ZenFone 8
5646
Sony Xperia Pro-I
5631
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
5565
Sony Xperia 1 III
5557
Leia Lume Pad 2
5546
Honor X40 GT
5492
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
5307
Sony Xperia 5 III
5303
Sharp Aquos R6
5133
Leica Leitz Phone 1
5064
Xiaomi Mi 11
5030
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
4598
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
4345
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N
1548
Realme GT 5G
1529
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
1529
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
1527
Oppo Find X5
1527
Redmagic 6R
1527
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
1523
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
1521
OnePlus 9RT 5G
1519
Sony Xperia Pro-I
1509
Asus ZenFone 8
1490
Sony Xperia 1 III
1485
Honor X40 GT
1477
Huawei P50 Pro (SDM888)
1464
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
1461
Sony Xperia 5 III
1438
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1433
Leica Leitz Phone 1
1408
Sharp Aquos R6
1375
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
1224
Xiaomi Mi 11
1194
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
1053
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Find N
5890
Oppo Find X5
5872
Realme GT 5G
5844
OnePlus 9RT 5G
5841
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
5818
Redmagic 6R
5818
Sony Xperia Pro-I
5777
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
5757
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
5747
Asus ZenFone 8
5743
Sony Xperia 1 III
5679
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
5627
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
5569
Xiaomi Mi 11
5342
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
4402
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
4383
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Asus ZenFone 8
38350
Sony Xperia 1 III
34104
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
31497
Redmagic 6R
31339
Xiaomi Mi 11
28956
Sharp Aquos R6
28897
Leica Leitz Phone 1
28434
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
25593
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
25152
PCMark for Android Work 2.0
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
9485
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Asus ZenFone 8
16735
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
15059
Sony Xperia 1 III
14589
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
14157
Leica Leitz Phone 1
14022
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
13778
Redmagic 6R
13205
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6R
13177
Xiaomi Mi 11
13126
Sharp Aquos R6
13029
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
1523
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
1521
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
1498
Asus ZenFone 8
1477
Sony Xperia 1 III
1292
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1272
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (SDM888)
1264
Xiaomi Mi 11
1175
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
1143

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
4259 +187.6%
1611 +8.8%
845 -42.9%
446 -69.9%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
15265 +302.3%
4517 +19.1%
2132 -43.8%
1441 -62%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
1683 +134.7%
1090 +52%
621 -13.4%
A9
520 -27.5%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
8464 +250.8%
4088 +69.4%
2142 -11.2%
1783 -26.1%
FP32 (float)
6110 +248.3%
2378 +35.6%
705 -59.8%
449 -74.4%
AiTuTu 3
620704 +23.2%
463872 -7.9%
389919 -22.6%