MediaTek Dimensity 1200

MediaTek Dimensity 1200

MediaTek Dimensity 1200: The Balance of Performance and Affordability in 2025

April 2025


Introduction

The MediaTek Dimensity 1200, released in 2021, marked an important milestone in the development of mobile processors. Despite the emergence of newer chips, it maintains its relevance in mid-budget smartphones ($300–500) by offering decent performance, 5G support, and energy efficiency by 2025. In this article, we will explore what makes this SoC noteworthy, how it performs in modern tasks, and who it is suitable for.


Architecture and Process Technology: The Foundation of Stability

The Dimensity 1200 is built on TSMC's 6nm process technology, which, by 2025, is not considered cutting-edge (leading chips have transitioned to 3–4nm) but remains a reliable option for balancing power and heat dissipation.

CPU:

- 8 cores with hybrid architecture:

- 1× Cortex-A78 @3.0 GHz (high-performance core);

- 3× Cortex-A78 @2.6 GHz (mid-load);

- 4× Cortex-A55 @2.0 GHz (energy-efficient tasks).

- L2 Cache: 320 KB (per A78 cluster).

This configuration ensures smooth multitasking: demanding applications run on powerful cores, while background processes leverage the energy-efficient cores.

GPU: Mali-G77 MC9 with 9 cores.

- Supports games with graphics up to Medium-HD/High-FHD (60 FPS) but falls short compared to modern GPUs like Mali-G710 or Adreno 7xx in flagship smartphones.

- HyperEngine 3.0 technology optimizes gaming performance by reducing latency.


Performance in Real Tasks: From Gaming to AI

Benchmarks:

- Geekbench 6: 1118 (Single-Core), 3198 (Multi-Core);

- AnTuTu 10: ~708,000 points.

Usage Scenarios:

1. Gaming:

- Genshin Impact: 45–55 FPS at medium settings (1080p);

- PUBG Mobile: 60 FPS in HD quality.

Active cooling in the smartphone is crucial; without it, throttling and FPS drops can occur after 20–30 minutes.

2. Multimedia:

- Supports displays with a refresh rate of 168 Hz (Full HD+);

- Hardware decoding for AV1 and HDR10+ for streaming.

3. AI Tasks:

- Neural network acceleration (up to 12 TOPs) enhances the performance of photo editors (e.g., automatic retouching in Lightroom).

Power Consumption and Heat:

- TDP of 10W is a moderate figure, but under peak load, temperatures may rise to 42–45°C;

- In everyday use (social media, video), the smartphone lasts 12–14 hours;

- Gaming reduces battery life to about 4–5 hours.


Built-in Connectivity Modules: Ready for the Future?

- 5G Modem: Supports SA/NSA with theoretical speeds of up to 4.7 Gbps, but in reality, delivers 1–1.5 Gbps in areas with good coverage.

- Wi-Fi 6: Speeds up to 2.4 Gbps—sufficient for 4K streaming.

- Bluetooth 5.2: Stable connection to wireless headphones and smartwatches.

- Satellite Communication: Absent—this feature is reserved for flagship devices from 2023–2025.


Comparison with Competitors: Where Does Dimensity 1200 Stand?

In 2025, this SoC competes with entry-level chips and those from previous generations:

1. Snapdragon 7 Gen 2 (2023):

- Better energy efficiency (4nm);

- 15% higher GPU performance.

2. Dimensity 8300 (2024):

- Support for Wi-Fi 7;

- High settings gaming capability thanks to the Mali-G615 GPU.

3. Exynos 1380 (2023):

- Comparable CPU performance but weaker in AI tasks.

Conclusion: The Dimensity 1200 lags behind newer chips in energy efficiency and graphics but excels in device pricing.


Usage Scenarios: Comfortable Limits

1. Gaming: Suitable for casual games and medium settings in AAA titles.

2. Everyday Tasks: Smooth operation with 10–15 applications running in the background.

3. Photo and Video:

- Supports cameras up to 200 MP (depends on the manufacturer's implementation);

- 4K@60fps video recording with HDR;

- Night mode with AI noise reduction.


Pros and Cons: An Honest Assessment

✅ Pros:

- Affordable device prices ($300–500);

- Support for 5G and Wi-Fi 6;

- Good optimization for multitasking.

❌ Cons:

- Weaker GPU compared to modern counterparts;

- Heating under prolonged load;

- Lack of satellite connectivity.


Practical Tips for Choosing a Smartphone

1. Cooling: Look for models with vapor chambers or graphite plates.

2. Display: Full HD+ with a refresh rate of 90–120 Hz is ideal for gaming and videos.

3. Battery: At least 5000 mAh to compensate for power consumption.

4. Updates: Look for a guarantee of 2–3 years of Android updates (e.g., Xiaomi and Realme often update their lines).

Examples of 2025 Devices:

- Realme GT Neo 3T ($350): AMOLED 120 Hz, 65W charging.

- Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro+ ($400): 108 MP camera, stereo speakers.


Final Conclusion: Who Is the Dimensity 1200 For?

This processor is a choice for those who:

- Do not want to overpay for flagship models but desire stable performance in games and applications;

- Value 5G support and modern connectivity standards;

- Use their smartphone as a multimedia hub (streaming, photo editing).

Main Benefits: A balance of price and performance, readiness for future networks, and versatility. If you are not a professional streamer or esports player, the Dimensity 1200 remains a cost-effective option in 2025 without unnecessary compromises.

Basic

Label Name
MediaTek
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Launch Date
January 2021
Manufacturing
TSMC
Model Name
MT6893
Architecture
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores
8
Technology
6 nm
Frequency
3000 MHz

GPU Specifications

GPU name
Mali-G77 MP9
GPU frequency
850 MHz
FLOPS
0.9792 TFLOPS
Shading units
64
Execution units
9
OpenCL version
2.0
Vulkan version
1.3
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

4G support
LTE Cat. 19
5G support
Yes
Bluetooth
5.2
Wi-Fi
6
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR4X
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 3.0
L2 Cache
320 KB
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Storage type
UFS 3.1
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
TDP
10 W
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
1118
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
3198
FP32 (float)
Score
999
AnTuTu 10
Score
708061
AiTuTu 3
Score
92281

Phones with Dimensity 1200

OnePlus Nord 2 5G
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
Realme GT Neo
Realme GT Neo
Realme GT Neo 2T
Realme GT Neo 2T
Realme GT Neo Flash
Realme GT Neo Flash
Realme X7 Max 5G
Realme X7 Max 5G
Xiaomi Mi 11T
Xiaomi Mi 11T
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition

Comparison of Devices with Dimensity 1200

3DMark Sling Shot
Realme GT Neo
7775
Realme GT Neo Flash
7687
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
7640
Realme X7 Max 5G
7478
Realme GT Neo 2T
7404
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
7290
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
7154
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 11T
7396
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
7331
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
7192
Realme GT Neo 2T
7014
Realme GT Neo Flash
6868
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
6754
Realme X7 Max 5G
6431
Realme GT Neo
6429
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 11T
9135
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
9054
Realme GT Neo Flash
8104
Realme GT Neo 2T
7911
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
7783
Realme GT Neo
7682
Realme X7 Max 5G
7533
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
447
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
445
Realme GT Neo 2T
442
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
442
Realme GT Neo
441
Xiaomi Mi 11T
441
Realme X7 Max 5G
441
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
441
Realme GT Neo Flash
440
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
439
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
336
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
4558
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
4546
Xiaomi Mi 11T
4520
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
4484
Realme X7 Max 5G
4251
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
4244
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4197
Realme GT Neo 2T
4189
Realme GT Neo
4171
Realme GT Neo Flash
4162
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Mi 11T
1311
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
1311
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
1301
Realme GT Neo 2T
1298
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
1291
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
1290
Realme X7 Max 5G
1287
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
1286
Realme GT Neo Flash
1286
Realme GT Neo
1284
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
4542
Xiaomi Mi 11T
4527
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
4509
Realme GT Neo 2T
4508
Realme GT Neo Flash
4321
Realme X7 Max 5G
4210
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4192
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
4178
Realme GT Neo
4177
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Realme GT Neo 2T
36303
Realme GT Neo Flash
35412
Realme GT Neo
35053
Realme X7 Max 5G
33849
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
32117
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
30061
Xiaomi Mi 11T
28532
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
26562
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
26516
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
23939
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Realme X7 Max 5G
15887
Realme GT Neo 2T
15774
Realme GT Neo
15662
Realme GT Neo Flash
14415
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
11751
Xiaomi Mi 11T
11708
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
11688
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
10537
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
10067
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
9784
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT Neo 2T
1287
Xiaomi Mi 11T
1261
Realme X7 Max 5G
1261
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
1259
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
1257
Realme GT Neo Flash
1252
Realme GT Neo
1246

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
4259 +280.9%
1506 +34.7%
764 -31.7%
408 -63.5%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
15265 +377.3%
4368 +36.6%
1941 -39.3%
1255 -60.8%
FP32 (float)
1788 +79%
588 -41.1%
392 -60.8%
AnTuTu 10
1846775 +160.8%
959921 +35.6%
512281 -27.7%
419580 -40.7%
AiTuTu 3
93682 +1.5%
92870 +0.6%
89184 -3.4%
87111 -5.6%