Samsung Exynos 1280
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1280
and
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (5 nm vs 6 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2022 (March 2022 vs January 2021)
- Higher Frequency: 3000 MHz (2400 MHz vs 3000 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
March 2022
Launch Date
January 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8825
Model Name
MT6893
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
6 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
3000 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G68 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G77 MP9
1000 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
0.487 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.9792 TFLOPS
48
Shading units
64
4
Execution units
9
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 2550 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 19
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
320 KB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 2.2
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
10 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 3.0
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1280
852
Dimensity 1200
1118
+31%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1280
1927
Dimensity 1200
3198
+66%
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1280
497
Dimensity 1200
999
+101%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1280
490914
Dimensity 1200
708061
+44%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
4671
Realme GT Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
7775
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
3827
Xiaomi Mi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
7396
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Exynos 1280
4926
Xiaomi Mi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
9135
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy F34
Samsung Exynos 1280
226
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
447
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy M34 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280
2307
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
4558
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1280)
Samsung Exynos 1280
18316
Realme GT Neo 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
36303
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1280)
Samsung Exynos 1280
14150
Realme X7 Max 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
15887
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1280-vs-mediatek-dimensity-1200" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200</a>