Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 processor review

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100: The Entry-Level Chip of the New Windows on Arm Platform

For a long time, nearly all Windows laptops relied on the x86 platform from Intel and AMD. This ensured wide compatibility with legacy software, drivers, peripherals, and games, but it also came with a considerable legacy burden: a complex architecture, higher power requirements, and frequent dependence on active cooling.

ARM has taken a different approach. This architecture grew out of mobile devices, where not only peak speed is important, but also efficiency: how much work the chip does per watt of energy. Smartphones have long demonstrated that ARM can be both fast and economical, but for a long time, this idea did not perform well in the world of full-fledged laptops.

Apple has shown on the mass market that ARM can serve as the foundation not only for phones but also for serious laptops. The transition of Macs to Apple Silicon made a simple point clear: a thin computer can be fast, quiet, and have a long battery life without the classic x86 approach.

Qualcomm, alongside Microsoft, is attempting to make a similar transition in the world of Windows. Snapdragon X is not just another line of processors; it is an effort to bring the ARM philosophy to Windows laptops: low power consumption, good battery life, quick wake-from-sleep, built-in NPU, and performance sufficient not just for browsing.

In this context, Snapdragon X X1-26-100 becomes interesting. It is not the flagship or the fastest chip from Qualcomm. It is the entry-level model of the Snapdragon X platform. It clearly shows what is left of the Windows on Arm idea when you remove the reserve of the higher X Plus and X Elite: 8 Oryon cores, an NPU of up to 45 TOPS, good speed for everyday tasks, but less powerful graphics and lower performance headroom for the future.

What's Inside Snapdragon X X1-26-100

Snapdragon X X1-26-100 features 8 Qualcomm Oryon cores. Unlike many modern Intel and AMD processors, it does not have the familiar hybrid scheme with performance and efficiency cores. All cores belong to one architectural line, making the CPU's behavior simpler: it does not distribute tasks among different types of cores but uses eight identical ARM cores.

For a thin laptop, this is a suitable foundation-without flagship ambitions, but with good responsiveness in browsers, office applications, video calls, and everyday multitasking.

The chip supports LPDDR5X memory, comes with built-in graphics X1-45, and a separate NPU of up to 45 TOPS. This is important: X1-26-100 is not a processor “without iGPU.” There is integrated graphics here, but it is an entry-level version, so one should not expect it to compete with fast integrated Radeon or discrete graphics cards.

The NPU is one of the key reasons for this platform’s existence. In a typical browser or Excel, it will not make the laptop noticeably faster, but for local AI functions in Windows, camera processing, noise cancellation, background in video calls, and similar tasks, a dedicated NPU here truly makes sense.

Position of Snapdragon X X1-26-100 Within the Lineup

Processor Cores CPU Frequency Cache GPU NPU Positioning
Snapdragon X X1-26-100 8 up to 3.0 GHz 30 MB X1-45 up to 45 TOPS Base Snapdragon X
Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 8 up to 3.4 GHz 30 MB X1-45 up to 45 TOPS Entry-level X Plus
Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 8 up to 4.0 GHz in boost 30 MB X1-45 up to 45 TOPS Fast 8-core X Plus
Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 10 up to 3.4 GHz 42 MB X1-85 up to 45 TOPS Stronger CPU and GPU
Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 12 up to 3.4 GHz 42 MB X1-85 up to 45 TOPS Higher class Snapdragon X

The table shows the key point: the X1-26-100 does not have a cut-down NPU-the AI block remains at the platform level. The savings are visible in other areas: lower CPU frequency, only 8 cores, and entry-level graphics X1-45. Thus, it is more logical to perceive X1-26-100 as the most basic Snapdragon X rather than as "almost X Elite."

Performance: Quick for a Thin Laptop, but No Headroom for Higher Models

In Geekbench 6, Snapdragon X X1-26-100 scores about 2120 points in the single-core test and around 10339 points in the multi-core test. For a thin laptop, this is an acceptable level: browsing, office work, messaging, video calls, document handling, academic tasks, and light photo editing should not be a problem.

However, the result is only important in context. Snapdragon X is interesting not because it is necessarily faster than all x86 chips, but because it aims to provide comparable everyday speed in a more mobile format: a thin chassis, low consumption, quiet operation, and long battery life. That is the platform's primary purpose.

Processor Class Geekbench 6 Single Geekbench 6 Multi Comparison Details
Snapdragon X X1-26-100 Base Snapdragon X 2120 10339 Good level for everyday ARM laptop
Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 Entry-level X Plus 2377 11147 Faster due to higher frequency
Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 Fast 8-core X Plus 2375 11571 Noticeably better in multi-core
Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 10-core X Plus 2348 12663 Already a different level of multi-threading
Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 12-core X Elite 2279 11607 More cores, but result depends on laptop
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H x86 Windows Competitor 2256 10239 Close multi-core, higher single-core
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Strong x86 ultrabook chip 2497 11558 Faster CPU and noticeably stronger graphics
Apple M3 ARM macOS competitor 2855 10621 Much stronger single-core, close multi-core

In CPU performance, Snapdragon X X1-26-100 does not appear weak. In the multi-core test, it stays close to the Core Ultra 5 125H and Apple M3, which is quite decent for an entry-level Snapdragon X model. However, in single-core performance, it falls short compared to Apple M3, Ryzen 7 8840U, and higher-end Snapdragon X Plus models. So, one shouldn’t expect the feeling of a flagship ARM chip from it.

The main takeaway: X1-26-100 is not a record-breaker but a balanced entry-level processor. It provides adequate everyday speed without the headroom of X1P-64-100, X Elite, strong Ryzens, or Apple M-series.

Integrated Graphics Available, but Not for Gaming

Snapdragon X X1-26-100 has integrated graphics X1-45. It is sufficient for Windows, video playback, external monitors, web applications, casual games, and older projects. However, for modern gaming, this GPU is unsuitable.

The problem is not just in graphics power. Windows on Arm can introduce issues with compatibility, emulation, drivers, anti-cheats, and gaming launchers. Thus, among laptops without discrete graphics, AMD's platforms with Radeon 780M or newer integrated graphics appear to be more predictable choices for gaming: they run in a familiar x86 environment with less risk that a game may simply not launch.

If gaming is a priority, integrated graphics should not be considered a primary option at all. In this class, discrete graphics cards make the difference, and models with NVIDIA GeForce RTX will perform significantly better.

For everyday use, the entry-level iGPU X1-45 is not critical. For gaming, it is one of the main limitations of Snapdragon X X1-26-100.

Windows on Arm: The Main Nuance in Choosing

Snapdragon X X1-26-100 cannot be assessed solely based on benchmarks. This is an ARM processor for Windows, and compatibility may be more important than a 10-15% CPU performance difference.

Modern Windows on Arm has improved significantly compared to a few years ago. Browsers, office applications, messaging apps, video calls, and many popular software now work fine-either natively or through emulation. For a user who primarily uses Chrome, Edge, Office, Google Docs, Telegram, Zoom, and web services, there may be no issues at all.

The weak points are older utilities, specific professional software, drivers, plugins, some VPN clients, peripherals, and games. Before purchasing a laptop with Snapdragon X, it is better to check not the abstract “performance of ARM” but your actual set of software. If all necessary programs work correctly, the platform can be very pleasant. If there is a reliance on old x86 software, Intel or AMD remains the safer choice.

The crucial question when choosing a laptop with X1-26-100 is not “Will it run the browser?” but “Does my software set work on Windows on Arm?”

Who Should Consider Snapdragon X X1-26-100

Snapdragon X X1-26-100 is worth considering if you need a lightweight laptop for studying, office work, browsing, email, documents, video calls, watching movies, and working on the go.

Best scenarios include:

  • A laptop for study and office use;
  • A mobile work machine for browsing, documents, and video calls;
  • A thin Copilot+ PC without gaming claims;
  • A travel device where battery life is more critical than maximum power.

Do not choose X1-26-100 for heavy video editing, 3D modeling, modern gaming, engineering software, or tasks where maximum compatibility with x86 applications and drivers is critical.

Conclusion

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 is the entry-level model of the Snapdragon X platform. It features 8 Oryon cores, integrated graphics, and an NPU of up to 45 TOPS, but within the lineup, it is clearly positioned lower than X Plus and X Elite: lower frequencies, fewer cores, weaker GPU, and less performance headroom for the future. This processor is built for modern laptops with Windows on Arm, rather than a universal platform for all tasks.

But therein lies its essence. X1-26-100 illustrates the entry-level version of the new Windows laptop idea: less focus on raw power, more on battery life, quiet operation, mobility, and AI features. If you need a laptop for browsing, documents, study, video calls, and battery operation, such a chip looks reasonable.

If you require a universal computer “for everything,” including gaming, older professional software, and non-standard peripherals, the familiar x86 platforms from AMD and Intel are still the safer bet. Snapdragon X X1-26-100 is interesting not as a replacement for all laptops at once but as the most accessible way to try the new Windows on Arm platform without switching to Mac.

Basic

Label Name
Qualcomm
Platform
Laptop
Launch Date
January 2025
CPU Architecture
64-bit architecture
CPU Name
Qualcomm Oryon CPU
Part Number
X1-26-100
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

CPU Specifications

Boost Frequency
None
Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
8
Cache
?
CPU Cache is an area of fast memory located on the processor. Intel® Smart Cache refers to the architecture that allows all cores to dynamically share access to the last level cache.
30 MB
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
4nm

Memory Specifications

Memory Bus Width
16-bit x 8 channels
Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
LPDDR5x
Max Memory Size
?
Max memory size refers to the maximum memory capacity supported by the processor.
64 GB
Memory Channels
?
The number of memory channels refers to the bandwidth operation for real world application.
8
Max Memory Bandwidth
?
Max Memory bandwidth is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored into a semiconductor memory by the processor (in GB/s).
135 GB/s
Maximum Memory Speed
8448 MT/s

GPU Specifications

Display Processing Unit
Adreno DPU
External Display Standard
DisplayPort 1.4
GPU Name
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Max External Display Resolution
3 displays up to UHD 60 Hz HDR10; 2 displays up to 5K 60 Hz or UHD 120 Hz
Max On-Device Display Resolution
Up to QHD+ 120 Hz HDR10
On-Device Display Standard
eDP v1.4b
Video Concurrency
4K 30 FPS 8-bit decode + 1080p 30 FPS encode; 1080p 60 FPS 10-bit decode + 1080p 30 FPS encode
Video Decode
4K 30 FPS 10-bit playback: HEVC, VP9, AV1; 4K 60 FPS 8-bit playback: H.264, HEVC
Video Encode
4K UHD 30 FPS 8-bit recording: H.264, HEVC, AV1
Video Processing Unit
Adreno VPU
Graphics Performance
1.7 TFLOPS

AI Specifications

Micro NPU
Dual Micro NPU on the Qualcomm Sensing Hub
NPU Name
Qualcomm Hexagon NPU
NPU Performance
45 TOPS

Connectivity

Bluetooth Connection Technology
Bluetooth LE
Bluetooth Version
Bluetooth 5.4
Cellular Bandwidth
1000 MHz bandwidth mmWave, 300 MHz bandwidth sub-6 GHz
Cellular Peak Download Speed
10 Gbps
Cellular Peak Upload Speed
3.5 Gbps
Wi-Fi Bands
6 GHz, 5 GHz, 2.4 GHz
Wireless System
Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 Mobile Connectivity System

Interfaces and Ports

NVMe Support
NVMe SSD over PCIe Gen 4
SD Standard
SD v3.0
USB Interface Type
3x USB4 40 Gbps, 2x USB 3.2 Gen2x1, 1x eUSB2
USB Version
USB 4.0

Miscellaneous

Always Sensing
Supported
Audio Technology
Qualcomm Aqstic audio technology, Qualcomm aptX Audio
Image Signal Processor
Qualcomm Spectra ISP
Single Camera Support
Up to 36 MP
Video Capture
4K HDR video capture

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23
Single Core Score
973
Cinebench R23
Multi Core Score
7294
Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
2248
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
11665
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
1576
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
6244
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
2869
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
16359
Cinebench 2024
Single Core Score
96
Cinebench 2024
Multi Core Score
684
3DMark CPU Profile
Single Core Score
690
3DMark CPU Profile
Multi Core Score
5694

Compared to Other CPU

Cinebench R23 Single Core
1760 +80.9%
M2
1541 +58.4%
1229 +26.3%
997 +2.5%
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15148 +107.7%
12370 +69.6%
8800 +20.6%
255 -96.5%
Geekbench 6 Single Core
2438 +8.5%
M1
2347 +4.4%
2186 -2.8%
2116 -5.9%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
13136 +12.6%
12359 +5.9%
11050 -5.3%
10405 -10.8%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
1698 +7.7%
1637 +3.9%
1505 -4.5%
1437 -8.8%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
7063 +13.1%
6618 +6%
5956 -4.6%
5749 -7.9%
Passmark CPU Single Core
3005 +4.7%
2934 +2.3%
2796 -2.5%
2749 -4.2%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
17960 +9.8%
17088 +4.5%
15752 -3.7%
15187 -7.2%
Cinebench 2024 Single Core
107 +11.5%
99 +3.1%
88 -8.3%
Cinebench 2024 Multi Core
M2
566 -17.3%
M1
444 -35.1%
3DMark CPU Profile Single Core
693 +0.4%
693 +0.4%
685 -0.7%
526 -23.8%
3DMark CPU Profile Multi Core
5873 +3.1%
5869 +3.1%
5666 -0.5%
5664 -0.5%