NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in 2025: Is It Worth Considering?
A professional analysis of an outdated yet relevant GPU
Introduction
Even in 2025, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q continues to occupy a niche for budget solutions in compact laptops. Despite lacking support for modern technologies like ray tracing, it remains a choice for those who value the balance of price and baseline performance. Let's explore who this model suits today and what compromises are necessary.
1. Architecture and Key Features
Turing Architecture: A Modest Legacy
The GTX 1650 Max Q is built on Turing architecture (12 nm, TSMC), but it lacks dedicated RT and Tensor Cores. This means features like ray tracing (RTX) and DLSS are unavailable. The focus is primarily on energy efficiency: it has 1024 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1020 MHz (with dynamic boost up to 1245 MHz).
Max Q — The Philosophy of Compactness
NVIDIA's Max Q technology is designed to reduce TDP (down to 30–35 W) and GPU size, making the card ideal for thin ultrabooks. However, this is accomplished by lowering clock speeds compared to the desktop GTX 1650.
2. Memory: Limitations and Consequences
GDDR6 and 4 GB: Is it Enough in 2025?
The graphics card is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus. The bandwidth is 192 GB/s, which is sufficient for gaming at low and medium settings in 1080p. However, in modern projects (like Starfield or GTA VI), the memory volume becomes a bottleneck: high-quality textures can "consume" over 6 GB of VRAM.
Why GDDR6 is Still Relevant?
The GDDR6 memory type provides acceptable speeds for undemanding tasks, but in professional applications (3D rendering, AI work), 4 GB is evidently insufficient.
3. Gaming Performance: Realities of 2025
1080p — Comfort Zone
In games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Hogwarts Legacy at medium settings, the GTX 1650 Max Q delivers 25–35 FPS. In less demanding titles (Fortnite, Apex Legends), it can reach 50–60 FPS (Medium settings).
1440p and 4K: Not for This Card
Even at 1080p, some games with advanced lighting or detail will stutter. Resolutions above Full HD (such as 1440p) require lowering settings to Low, making gameplay less enjoyable.
Ray Tracing: Lack of Support
Without dedicated RT cores, enabling ray tracing drops the FPS below 15 frames. This renders the GTX 1650 Max Q unfit for games with RTX effects.
4. Professional Tasks: Not a Major Asset
Video Editing and 3D Modeling
For work in Adobe Premiere Pro or Blender, 4 GB of VRAM is critically insufficient. Rendering complex scenes will take 2–3 times longer than on cards with 8 GB (like the RTX 3050).
CUDA: The Only Advantage
CUDA core support simplifies filter processing in DaVinci Resolve or training simple neural networks, but for serious tasks (like rendering in Maya), it’s better to choose a card with larger memory capacity.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Generation
TDP 35 W: Ideal for Ultrabooks
Low power consumption allows the GTX 1650 Max Q to be used in laptops with passive or modest active cooling. Even under full load, the temperature rarely exceeds 75–80°C.
Cooling Recommendations
— Use laptop cooling pads for extended gaming sessions.
— Regularly clean the vents of dust.
— Avoid working on soft surfaces (cushions, blankets) to prevent airflow blockage.
6. Comparison with Competitors
AMD Radeon RX 6500M: An Alternative with Caveats
The RX 6500M (4 GB GDDR6) offers similar performance but supports FSR 2.0, providing a boost in FPS in games. However, its TDP is higher (40–50 W), impacting laptop battery life.
Intel Arc A380M: A New Player
The Arc A380M (6 GB GDDR6) outperforms the GTX 1650 Max Q in Vulkan games (Doom Eternal) and supports hardware Ray Tracing, but its drivers are still immature. The price starts at $600, which is 15–20% higher.
7. Practical Advice for Users
Power Supply: 65–90 W
Laptops with the GTX 1650 Max Q typically come with 65–90 W adapters. To ensure stable operation, avoid cheap noname chargers.
Compatibility with Platforms
The card is compatible with Intel 10th–12th generation processors and AMD Ryzen 5000/6000. If upgrading older systems (like those with Ryzen 3000), check for PCIe 3.0 support.
Drivers: Relevance in 2025
NVIDIA continues to release updates for the GTX 16 series, but performance optimization for new games is weaker than for the RTX 30/40 series. It is recommended to use the Game Ready Driver version 550 and above.
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
— Low power consumption and heat generation.
— Suitable for thin laptops.
— Affordable price: laptops with this card start from $550.
Cons:
— 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for modern games and professional tasks.
— No support for DLSS/RTX.
— Lags behind newer budget GPUs (like the RTX 2050 2024).
9. Final Conclusion: Who Should Consider the GTX 1650 Max Q?
This graphics card is a choice for:
1. Students needing a lightweight laptop for study and occasional gaming.
2. Office users working with browsers and office applications.
3. Budget gamers willing to play at Medium-HD instead of Ultra-4K.
In 2025, the GTX 1650 Max Q is a compromise. If your budget is limited to $600–700, and the weight and thickness of the laptop are critical, it still has a place. However, for future upgrades, it's better to look for models with 6–8 GB VRAM and support for FSR/DLSS.
P.S. Don't forget: technology is continuously advancing. Even in the budget segment, solutions with a better price-to-performance ratio are emerging — for example, Intel Arc B580M or AMD Radeon RX 6600M. Choose wisely!