MediaTek Dimensity 9400

MediaTek Dimensity 9400
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 mobile chipset review

MediaTek Dimensity 9400: Eight Big Cores and a Significant Leap in Graphics

The Dimensity 9400 retains the All Big Core architecture: there are still no small Cortex-A5xx cores in its CPU. All eight cores belong to performance-oriented Arm families, with the main upgrade being the Cortex-X925. The transition to TSMC N3E and the new Immortalis-G925 elevate the 9400 to the level of Snapdragon 8 Elite in overall performance.

The chip was released on October 9, 2024, and appears in Vivo X200, X200 Pro, X200 Pro Mini, OPPO Find X8, Find X8 Pro, and iQOO Neo10 Pro. There are enough production devices to evaluate the chip based on real smartphones rather than engineering samples.

Cortex-X925 - The Main Change from Dimensity 9300

The Dimensity 9300 used four Cortex-X4 and four Cortex-A720 cores. In the 9400, one Cortex-X4 is replaced with a new Cortex-X925 clocked up to 3.62 GHz:

  • 1× Cortex-X925 up to 3.62 GHz;
  • 3× Cortex-X4;
  • 4× Cortex-A720.

It is the Cortex-X925 that brings the main boost in single-threaded performance. MediaTek also increased the L2 and L3 cache sizes and moved from TSMC N4P to the more advanced N3E.

The All Big Core scheme remains the same. Even the smaller cluster consists of Cortex-A720 cores, so there are no traditional energy-efficient Cortex-A5xx cores here. This configuration ensures high multi-threaded performance but is more dependent on cooling and power limits.

The Hidden Context of the Lineup

The Dimensity 9400 does not feature a completely new CPU architecture. The new element here is the Cortex-X925; Cortex-X4 and Cortex-A720 have carried over from the previous generation of Arm.

Chip CPU Architecture Year of Architecture Launch Main Difference
Dimensity 9300 4× Cortex-X4 + 4× Cortex-A720 2023 First MediaTek flagship with All Big Core
Dimensity 9300+ 4× Cortex-X4 + 4× Cortex-A720 2023 Increased frequencies
Dimensity 9400 1× Cortex-X925 + 3× Cortex-X4 + 4× Cortex-A720 2024 New Cortex-X925, more cache, new GPU
Dimensity 9400+ 1× Cortex-X925 + 3× Cortex-X4 + 4× Cortex-A720 2024 Cortex-X925 frequency increased to 3.73 GHz

Dimensity 9400+ is not a new generation of architecture, but an accelerated version of the 9400. The CPU configuration and graphics core are the same in both.

Performance in Real Smartphones

The results from smartphones using the Dimensity 9400 vary significantly. In Geekbench 6, production devices with this chip score approximately 2000-2750 in Single-Core and 7500-8600 in Multi-Core.

OPPO Find X8 Pro scores about 2600 in single-thread tests and 7500 in multi-thread tests, while some Vivo X200 Pro devices reach around 2750 and 8500 points.

One Geekbench result poorly represents the Dimensity 9400 as a whole. The difference between smartphones with the same chip can exceed 10%.

The variation persists in AnTuTu:

Smartphone AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Pro ~2.90 million
iQOO Neo10 Pro ~2.84 million
Vivo X200 ~2.82 million
OPPO Find X8 Pro ~2.71 million

The gap between devices with the same Dimensity 9400 reaches about 200,000 points.

In individual rankings, the Vivo X200 Pro also outperformed smartphones on the Snapdragon 8 Elite. The difference varies by device, but in overall performance, the Dimensity 9400 is already comparable to the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

Immortalis-G925 - The Main Update of the Generation

The Dimensity 9400 features a 12-core Immortalis-G925 graphics unit.

MediaTek claims up to a 41% increase in peak graphical performance compared to the Dimensity 9300, up to a 40% improvement in ray tracing, and up to 44% better energy efficiency.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad Light, devices with Dimensity 9400 showed scores around 2700 points, while the Apple A18 Pro scored approximately 2200.

For gaming, peak numbers are important, but so is performance per watt. In Genshin Impact, the Vivo X200 Pro demonstrated power consumption of about 4.4 W while maintaining a high frame rate.

The most noticeable improvement compared to the Dimensity 9300 came in the graphics department.

Cooling Affects Sustained Performance

All Big Core provides high peak performance, but under heavy CPU load, power consumption quickly rises. In certain short tests, the Dimensity 9400 exceeded 18 W.

This is a brief peak rather than typical continuous consumption. But it indicates why cooling is especially important here. A large chassis and powerful vapor chamber allow for prolonged high frequencies, whereas compact models hit thermal limits sooner.

Therefore, for assessing the Dimensity 9400, extended tests of specific smartphones are more critical than one short result from Geekbench or AnTuTu.

AI, Camera, and Memory

The NPU 890 is designed for local generative models and other AI workloads. Specific features are defined by the smartphone manufacturer.

The ISP Imagiq 1090 supports 8K Dolby Vision HDR, HDR video with zoom, and quick switching between cameras. The quality of shooting still depends on the sensors, optics, and processing.

The Dimensity 9400 supports LPDDR5X memory with speeds up to 10,667 Mbps. High bandwidth is particularly beneficial for GPU and local AI workloads.

Dimensity 9400 or 9400+: How Big is the Difference?

The Dimensity 9400+ uses the same configuration:

  • 1× Cortex-X925;
  • 3× Cortex-X4;
  • 4× Cortex-A720;
  • Immortalis-G925.

The main change is the frequency of the Cortex-X925, which has been raised from 3.62 to 3.73 GHz.

In CPU tests, this typically provides a few percentage points of additional performance. Therefore, price, cooling, battery, and the specific smartphone's cameras are more important than the "plus" suffix in the SoC name.

Conclusion

The Dimensity 9400 completely closes the noticeable gap between MediaTek and Qualcomm flagships. The Cortex-X925 boosted single-threaded performance, the eight big cores maintained high multi-core performance, and the Immortalis-G925 provided a particularly noticeable boost in gaming.

The Snapdragon 8 Elite remains faster in some CPU tests, but the gap is no longer sufficient to regard Qualcomm's solution as a separate class. In graphics, the Dimensity 9400 competes directly with the Snapdragon 8 Elite and occasionally comes out ahead in certain tests.

The main nuance of the Dimensity 9400 is its dependence on the cooling and power limits of specific smartphones. With good cooling, the chip maintains high levels of CPU and GPU performance; under strict thermal constraints, it quickly throttles frequencies.

Basic

Label Name
MediaTek
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Launch Date
November 2024
Manufacturing
TSMC
Model Name
Dimensity 9400
Architecture
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A730
Cores
8
Technology
3 nm
Frequency
3400 MHz

GPU Specifications

GPU frequency
1300 MHz
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160

Connectivity

4G support
LTE Cat. 24
5G support
Yes
Bluetooth
5.4
Wi-Fi
7
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR5T
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
Storage type
UFS 4.0
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
2832
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
11974
AnTuTu 10
Score
3518353
AiTuTu 3
Score
232946

Phones with Dimensity 9400

Oppo Find X8
Oppo Find X8
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
Vivo X200
Vivo X200
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Vivo X200 Pro Mini

Comparison of Devices with Dimensity 9400

3DMark Solar Bay
Oppo Find X8 Pro
11475
Oppo Find X8
11156
Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
10746
Vivo X200
10403
Vivo X200 Pro
10383
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
10157
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Oppo Find X8 Pro
805
Vivo X200
788
Oppo Find X8
784
Vivo X200 Pro
781
Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
777
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
765
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X200 Pro
762
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Oppo Find X8 Pro
11764
Vivo X200
11732
Vivo X200 Pro
11026
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
10909
Oppo Find X8
10445
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Oppo Find X8 Pro
2452
Oppo Find X8
2427
Vivo X200 Pro
2374
Vivo X200
2373
Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
2348
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
2280
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Oppo Find X8 Pro
2442
Vivo X200
2432
Vivo X200 Pro
2410
Oppo Find X8
2365
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
1952
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200 Pro
18601
Oppo Find X8 Pro
11807
Oppo Find X8
11706
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X8 Pro
6418
Oppo Find X8
6339
Vivo X200 Pro
6114
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
5665
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Vivo X200 Pro
164746
Oppo Find X8
164572
Oppo Find X8 Pro
158855
Vivo X200
158027
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
154935
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Oppo Find X8
16605
Vivo X200 Pro
15439
Oppo Find X8 Pro
15020
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
14447
Vivo X200
14338

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
4259 +50.4%
1071 -62.2%
852 -69.9%
453 -84%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
15265 +27.5%
3073 -74.3%
2145 -82.1%
1447 -87.9%
AnTuTu 10
4011932 +14%
3518353
915634 -74%
702277 -80%
532494 -84.9%
AiTuTu 3
361114 +55%
288795 +24%
219653 -5.7%
215106 -7.7%