Samsung Exynos 990

Samsung Exynos 990

Samsung Exynos 990: Review of a Processor Still Relevant in 2025

April 2025

Since its release in 2020, the Samsung Exynos 990 has remained one of the key chips for flagship smartphones from the South Korean giant. Despite the emergence of new generations of processors, devices based on the Exynos 990 continue to be in demand in 2025 due to their balance of performance, energy efficiency, and affordability. Let's explore what makes this SoC noteworthy, how it performs in real-world scenarios, and who should pay attention to it.


1. Architecture and Technology Process: Hybrid Power and 7nm

The Exynos 990 is built on a hybrid architecture with eight cores divided into three clusters:

- 2 high-performance Exynos M5 cores with a frequency of up to 2.73 GHz for resource-intensive tasks.

- 2 Cortex-A76 cores (2.5 GHz) for moderate workloads.

- 4 energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores (2.0 GHz) for background processes and basic applications.

The Mali-G77 MP11 GPU with 11 cores based on the Valhall architecture provides smooth graphics in games and accelerates video rendering. The 7nm (EUV) technology process reduces power consumption, although by 2025 this isn't the latest standard (new chips use 4-5nm). The 1MB L2 cache reduces latency when processing data.


2. Performance: Gaming, Multimedia, and AI

Gaming: The Mali-G77 MP11 handles projects like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty: Mobile on medium settings (1080p, 60 FPS). In 2025, this isn't cutting-edge, but it's sufficient for comfortable gaming. It's important that the smartphone has a cooling system — without it, throttling may begin after 20-30 minutes of play.

Multimedia: Support for 8K/30fps and 4K/120fps decoding is relevant for streaming and editing short videos. The chip also processes HDR10+ and dynamic scenes without lag.

Artificial Intelligence: The integrated dual-core NPU accelerates object recognition in the camera, automatic scene adjustment, and voice assistant functionality. For instance, the "Night Shot" mode is processed 15-20% faster compared to the Exynos 9820.

Power Consumption and Heating: With a TDP of 9W, it maintains moderate levels. With active use, the smartphone lasts 5-6 hours, while in standby it can go up to 2 days. Heating is noticeable during gaming and when recording in 8K, but in everyday tasks, the chip remains cool.


3. Integrated Modules: 5G, Wi-Fi 6, and More

- Exynos 5123 Modem: Supports sub-6GHz 5G (up to 5.1 Gbps) and 4G LTE Cat.24 (up to 3 Gbps). In 2025, this is adequate for most networks, but it does not support mmWave (millimeter waves).

- Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2: Stable connections with Wi-Fi 6 routers (up to 1.2 Gbps) and low power consumption for data transfer via Bluetooth.

- Navigation: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo — positioning accuracy within 1-3 meters.


4. Comparison with Competitors

In 2025, the Exynos 990 is often found in devices priced between $400-600, competing with:

- Snapdragon 870 (2021): Better in gaming (Adreno 650 vs. Mali-G77) but weaker in multitasking (Geekbench Multi: 2672 vs. 2400).

- Apple A14 Bionic (2020): Higher Single-Core scores (1600+ in Geekbench 6) but poorer optimization for Android applications.

- MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (2022): More modern 5G modem and support for Wi-Fi 6E, but similar gaming performance.

The Exynos 990 wins on the grounds of balance and availability in updated smartphones (such as the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 2023 Edition, which costs about $550 in 2025).


5. Use Scenarios: Who Is It Suitable For?

- Gaming: Suitable for less demanding games or with an external cooler.

- Everyday Tasks: Social media, streaming, office applications — everything runs smoothly.

- Photo and Video: 108 MP cameras, 8K recording, AI filters — the chip is still used in mid-range camera phones like the Galaxy A95 5G.


6. Pros and Cons

Pros:

- Optimized for One UI 6 (Android 15).

- Support for 8K and advanced shooting modes.

- Affordable prices for devices.

Cons:

- No support for Wi-Fi 7 and 5G mmWave.

- Heating during prolonged gaming sessions.


7. Tips for Choosing a Smartphone with Exynos 990

- Cooling: Look for models with vapor chambers or graphite plates (for example, the Galaxy S21 FE).

- RAM: At least 8 GB for multitasking.

- Battery: At least 4500 mAh to compensate for moderate energy efficiency.

Such devices are suitable for those looking for flagship experience for a reasonable price. In 2025, the Exynos 990 is mostly found in Galaxy A series smartphones and re-released flagships.


8. Final Conclusion: Who Should Choose It?

The Exynos 990 in 2025 represents a choice for optimal balance. It is suitable for:

- Users not chasing top performance, but desiring a smooth interface and good camera.

- Budget-conscious gamers — provided they use additional cooling.

- Travelers who value stable 5G and accurate GPS.

The main benefits are proven reliability, support for current communication standards, and the ability to buy a smartphone of previous flagship level for $400-600. If you do not need neural network features on the level of ChatGPT-5 or gaming in 8K, the Exynos 990 remains a worthwhile option.

Basic

Label Name
Samsung
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Launch Date
October 2019
Manufacturing
Samsung
Model Name
S5E9830
Architecture
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores
8
Technology
7 nm
Frequency
2730 MHz

GPU Specifications

GPU name
Mali-G77 MP11
GPU frequency
800 MHz
FLOPS
1.126 TFLOPS
Shading units
64
Execution units
11
OpenCL version
2.0
Vulkan version
1.3
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

4G support
LTE Cat. 24
5G support
Yes
Bluetooth
5.1
Wi-Fi
6
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR5
Memory frequency
2750 MHz
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
L2 Cache
1 MB
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 25MP
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video playback
8K at 30FPS
TDP
9 W
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
842
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
2672
FP32 (float)
Score
1149
AnTuTu 10
Score
721171

Phones with Exynos 990

Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)

Comparison of Devices with Exynos 990

3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
7642
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
7611
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
7600
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
7375
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
7373
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
7033
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
6963
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
5706
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
5261
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
5202
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
5176
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
5160
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
7365
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
7261
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
7172
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
7134
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
7056
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
6929
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
6759
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
6123
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
6027
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
5865
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
8723
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
8717
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
8710
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
8470
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
8280
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
8163
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
7917
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
7342
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
7275
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
494
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
493
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
491
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
491
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
426
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
425
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
386
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
341
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
332
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
247
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
4436
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
4321
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
4320
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
4317
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
4305
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
4298
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
4277
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
4250
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
4221
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
3784
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
1421
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
1420
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
1419
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
1418
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
1417
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
1417
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
1416
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
1414
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
1407
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
1065
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
4500
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
4365
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
4317
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
4295
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
4295
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
4293
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
4292
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
4284
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
4230
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
3827
PCMark for Android Storage
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
8587
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
19460
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
18007
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
17639
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
17505
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
16530
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
16452
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
16227
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
15786
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
15601
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
15385
PCMark for Android Work 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
9856
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
8697
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
12071
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
11673
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
11453
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
11369
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
11264
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
11206
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
11133
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
11124
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
11019
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
10784
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
1409
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
1398
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos 990)
1392
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Exynos 990)
1388
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990)
1388
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
1384
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
1383
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Exynos 990)
1353
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
1325
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
1280

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
1949 +131.5%
1118 +32.8%
432 -48.7%
226 -73.2%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
9895 +270.3%
3794 +42%
2672
1850 -30.8%
1143 -57.2%
FP32 (float)
5870 +410.9%
2213 +92.6%
1149
698 -39.3%
430 -62.6%
AnTuTu 10
2112459 +192.9%
1082930 +50.2%
721171
542568 -24.8%
428454 -40.6%