MediaTek Helio G85

MediaTek Helio G85
MediaTek Helio G85 mobile chipset review

MediaTek Helio G85: The “gaming” chip that has become stuck in budget smartphones

MediaTek Helio G85 is still found in low-cost smartphones, although even for the budget segment, it is already weak. The G designation once indicated a gaming positioning, but today this chip is primarily suitable for calls, navigation, video, and simple applications.

In new models, Helio G85 appears out of place: the fresh case and impressive camera array conceal an old 12nm chip without 5G and fast storage. It still manages basic tasks, but such smartphones have almost no speed headroom.

What Helio G85 Is

Helio G85 has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked up to 2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked up to 1.8 GHz. Graphics are handled by Mali-G52 MC2, with a frequency of up to 1 GHz. The chip works with LPDDR4X RAM and eMMC 5.1 storage, and the built-in modem is limited to 4G networks.

The lack of 5G is not the main limitation of Helio G85. The more noticeable issue is the slow storage. eMMC 5.1 falls significantly behind UFS: applications take longer to launch, updates install more slowly, and pauses often occur when working with files. As a result, even a comparatively lightweight Android interface starts to feel heavy over time.

In terms of architecture, Helio G85 hardly differs from Helio G80. The configuration of the CPU cores, memory controller, and modem remain the same. The main change is the increased frequency of the Mali-G52 MC2 from 950 MHz to 1 GHz. This is a slight overclocking of the graphics, rather than a fully new generation of processors.

Helio G85's Performance in Specific Smartphones

The Helio G85 shows similar but not identical results across different devices: firmware, temperature, and background processes influence the scores. A single run can easily distort the picture, so the table provides ranges of several Geekbench 6 results.

Smartphone RAM in Tests Geekbench 6, Single-Core Geekbench 6, Multi-Core
Motorola Moto G13 4 GB 435-448 1299-1447
Motorola Moto G23 8 GB 431-435 1419-1431
Xiaomi Redmi 13C 6-8 GB 408-439 1227-1444

Even 8 GB of RAM does not make Helio G85 faster. The large amount of RAM only allows the system to offload applications less frequently, but the computational speed of the chip does not change.

The low single-core result explains the slow launch of programs, delays in the browser, and sluggish interface response. There are differences between smartphones, but they are too small for good firmware to turn Helio G85 into a fast processor.

How Helio G85 Works with Everyday Tasks

Helio G85 handles calls, messaging, banking applications, navigation, and video just fine. As long as the user doesn’t keep multiple heavy applications open, the system operates tolerably.

However, the chip’s weaknesses become apparent with multitasking. The browser, maps, camera, and social media quickly occupy the two powerful cores, after which the interface starts to lag. Switching between applications slows down, and new versions of Android and proprietary skins only exacerbate the delays.

The large amount of RAM here can be misleading. For example, the Redmi 13C was released with either 6 or 8 GB of RAM and storage up to 256 GB. On paper, such a configuration looks solid, but even 8 GB of memory does not speed up the processor or the slow eMMC storage.

Therefore, a smartphone with Helio G85 should not be evaluated solely based on the amount of memory, camera resolution, or screen refresh rate. These specifications make the device more attractive in stores but do not eliminate delays in application launches and interface operations.

Can You Play on Helio G85?

MediaTek marketed Helio G85 as a gaming chip, but today this description sounds out of place. The Mali-G52 MC2 still manages undemanding online games and older titles. At low or medium settings, such games run adequately.

In heavy titles, you will have to lower the graphics quality, but that won't eliminate frame rate drops. In complex scenes, performance decreases, load times extend, and stutters appear after the chip heats up. You shouldn’t expect a stable 60 frames per second in modern demanding games from Helio G85.

HyperEngine is not a separate accelerator or a way to turn weak graphics into gaming performance. Rather, it refers to software features that allocate resources and manage the network connection during gaming. They can slightly smooth out drops but do not fix the old CPU cores and weak graphics.

Who Should Consider a Smartphone with Helio G85

A smartphone with Helio G85 makes sense to buy only under certain conditions:

  • It is significantly cheaper than models with newer processors.
  • The device is needed for calls, navigation, video, and simple applications.
  • 5G support is not required.
  • At least 6 GB of RAM is installed.
  • The user does not expect heavy gaming or intensive multitasking.

It's not worth overpaying for a device with Helio G85. A good screen, a large battery, and a 50-megapixel camera do not make the system faster. It’s better to pay a little more for a model with a newer chip and UFS storage: the speed difference will be noticeable not just in tests but also with every application launch.

Conclusion

MediaTek Helio G85 is a budget chip that has outlived its usefulness. For calls, video, and simple applications, it is still adequate, but its gaming status is now merely a name.

The purchase is justified only at a truly low price. For gaming, active multitasking, and purchasing with an eye toward several years of use, Helio G85 is already weak. A manufacturer’s cost-saving leads to slow application launches, interface pauses, and a smartphone that becomes outdated almost immediately after purchase.

Basic

Label Name
MediaTek
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
Launch Date
April 2020
Manufacturing
TSMC
Model Name
MT6769Z
Architecture
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores
8
Technology
12 nm
Frequency
2000 MHz

GPU Specifications

GPU name
Mali-G52 MP2
GPU frequency
1000 MHz
FLOPS
0.096 TFLOPS
Shading units
24
Execution units
2
OpenCL version
2.0
Vulkan version
1.3
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
5G support
No
Bluetooth
5.0
Wi-Fi
5
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR4X
Memory frequency
1800 MHz
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
Video capture
2K at 30FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video playback
2K at 30FPS
TDP
5 W
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
416
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
1338
FP32 (float)
Score
98
AnTuTu 10
Score
275547
AiTuTu 3
Score
39694

Phones with Helio G85

Motorola Moto G23
Motorola Moto G23
Motorola Moto G24
Motorola Moto G24
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Oppo A58
Oppo A58
Realme C65
Realme C65
Tecno Spark 20
Tecno Spark 20
Vivo Y28 4G
Vivo Y28 4G
Xiaomi Poco C65
Xiaomi Poco C65
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Xiaomi Redmi 13C

Comparison of Devices with Helio G85

3DMark Sling Shot
Motorola Moto G24
2078
Motorola Moto G24 Power
2074
Motorola Moto G23
1892
Vivo Y28 4G
1844
Tecno Spark 20
1827
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
1737
Xiaomi Poco C65
1724
Realme C65
1719
Oppo A58
1652
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Motorola Moto G24
1437
Motorola Moto G24 Power
1433
Tecno Spark 20
1425
Motorola Moto G23
1421
Realme C65
1414
Oppo A58
1392
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
1383
Xiaomi Poco C65
1370
Vivo Y28 4G
1350
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Motorola Moto G24
1426
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
1404
Xiaomi Poco C65
1392
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
1402
Xiaomi Poco C65
1386
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco C65
1732
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Poco C65
81
Vivo Y28 4G
81
Motorola Moto G24 Power
81
Motorola Moto G24
81
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
80
Realme C65
80
Tecno Spark 20
80
Motorola Moto G23
79
Oppo A58
79
3DMark Wild Life
Motorola Moto G23
746
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
742
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G23
189
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
158
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Motorola Moto G24
16317
Motorola Moto G23
16308
Xiaomi Poco C65
14870
Tecno Spark 20
14778
Motorola Moto G24 Power
14318
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
11086
Vivo Y28 4G
10840
Realme C65
8761
Oppo A58
6054
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G24 Power
9405
Motorola Moto G24
9299
Xiaomi Poco C65
9152
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
9141
Motorola Moto G23
8618
Realme C65
8606
Tecno Spark 20
8425
Vivo Y28 4G
7197
Oppo A58
6791

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
1180 +183.7%
943 +126.7%
698 +67.8%
416
138 -66.8%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
3343 +149.9%
2438 +82.2%
1826 +36.5%
1338
402 -70%
FP32 (float)
275 +180.6%
201 +105.1%
106 +8.2%
20 -79.6%
AnTuTu 10
521314 +89.2%
421461 +53%
316260 +14.8%
275547
59680 -78.3%
AiTuTu 3
41867 +5.5%
41855 +5.4%
41608 +4.8%
40506 +2%
39694