MediaTek Dimensity 7360

MediaTek Dimensity 7360
MediaTek Dimensity 7360 mobile chipset review

MediaTek Dimensity 7360: What Changed Besides the Name

Dimensity 7360 looks more like an update of the name than of the platform itself. The published specifications are hardly different from those of the Dimensity 7300: the CPU configuration, graphics, and supported memory types remain the same. MediaTek has not revealed any significant technical differences, so it cannot yet be considered a new generation.

Short Summary

Dimensity 7360 offers mid-range performance, but its Mali-G615 MC2 graphics are noticeably weaker than those of sub-flagship platforms. It has enough performance for everyday applications and online games, but in demanding graphics and prolonged loads, the gap with the Dimensity 8000 series becomes apparent.

This platform emphasizes energy efficiency rather than maximum speed. The index 7360 does not mean that the chip is positioned between the Dimensity 7300 and 7400; in terms of configuration, it is much closer to the first model.

Dimensity 7360 Results in Smartphones

Smartphone Geekbench 6 Single-Core Geekbench 6 Multi-Core AnTuTu
vivo V60 Lite 5G 1023 2817 904 210
vivo V60e 1027 2907 882 692
vivo V70 FE 1023 3035 990 352

In the three smartphones listed, the single-core results vary minimally. In the multi-core test, the difference reaches 8% in favor of the vivo V70 FE. This discrepancy is likely due to different power limits and cooling solutions of the devices.

Direct comparison of AnTuTu results here is not fair: tests may have been conducted in different benchmark versions. For the vivo V60 Lite 5G, AnTuTu 10 is specified, but the test version for the other two models is not confirmed.

Some of the variance might be explained by memory. For instance, the vivo V60e uses LPDDR4X and UFS 2.2, even though the Dimensity 7360 supports LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1. Therefore, the final score reflects not only the chip's capabilities but also the configuration of the specific smartphone.

CPU Performance

Dimensity 7360 features four powerful Cortex-A78 cores clocked up to 2.5 GHz and four energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. In Geekbench 6, the platform scores around 1000 points per core and 2800-3000 points across all cores-comparable to Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and Dimensity 7300.

In everyday applications, there will be almost no CPU limitations. The interface, browser, camera, and switching between apps do not require maximum power from this platform.

The shortcomings become apparent in video editing, emulation, and other tasks that heavily load all cores for extended periods. The performance of the Cortex-A78 cores already lags behind the new Cortex-A7xx cores used in more expensive platforms.

However, having four powerful cores still gives it an advantage over budget chips, where typically only two fast cores are available. Dimensity 7360 is better suited for multitasking and prolonged workloads than the Helio G series and lower-end Dimensity 6000 platforms.

Gaming Performance

The Mali-G615 MC2 graphics is the weak point of Dimensity 7360. The two graphics cores provide high frame rates in less demanding online games, but settings will have to be lowered in projects like Genshin Impact.

The vivo V60e shows about 60 FPS in Call of Duty: Mobile at high graphics settings and maximum frame rate. In BGMI at HDR Ultra profile, performance drops to about 35-40 FPS. Such figures are suitable for short gaming sessions but leave little room for raising settings or playing more demanding games.

For the vivo V60 Lite 5G, the manufacturer claims up to 90 FPS in Mobile Legends and around 60 FPS in Free Fire. These are lab data, so in prolonged gaming, the frame rate may drop due to heat and throttling.

The situation is less convincing with heavy projects. In Genshin Impact and Wuthering Waves, players will have to choose between graphics quality and frame stability. Dimensity 8300 and 8350 are noticeably better suited for demanding games.

Cameras, Display, and Connectivity

Dimensity 7360 supports cameras with resolutions up to 200 MP, electronic stabilization, and simultaneous shooting with two sensors. The maximum recording mode is 4K at 30 frames per second; 4K60 support is not claimed.

The platform is intended for Full HD+ displays with refresh rates of up to 144 Hz. This is sufficient for mid-range gaming smartphones, although the actual availability of a high frame rate depends on the game itself and the manufacturer’s settings.

The built-in modem supports 5G Release 16, aggregation of three carriers, and theoretical upload speeds of up to 3.27 Gbps. It also includes Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, and simultaneous operation of two SIM cards in 5G networks.

An NPU 655 is used for AI functions. It handles image processing, noise reduction, scene recognition, and other local algorithms but does not make Dimensity 7360 a platform for heavy generative models.

Dimensity 7360 vs. Dimensity 7300

According to the published specifications, there are almost no differences between these platforms. Both have:

  • four Cortex-A78 cores clocked up to 2.5 GHz;
  • four Cortex-A55 cores;
  • Mali-G615 MC2 graphics;
  • support for LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1;
  • an NPU 655;
  • a Release 16 5G modem;
  • support for cameras up to 200 MP and 4K30 recording.

MediaTek does not claim increased CPU or GPU frequencies, a new memory controller, or a reworked image processing block. Therefore, any possible differences likely relate to an internal revision of the chip, power consumption settings, or the requirements of a specific smartphone manufacturer.

The Turbo suffix also does not guarantee a separate version of the processor. Until MediaTek and device manufacturers reveal technical differences, it should be viewed as part of the marketing name of the smartphone rather than as confirmation of a more powerful chip.

Conclusion

The main problem with the Dimensity 7360 lies not in performance but in unclear positioning. In terms of speed, this is a mid-range platform that handles everyday tasks and online games without any issues but is limited in heavy projects by its two-core graphics.

In practice, the result largely depends on the smartphone itself-its memory, cooling, and power limits. A model with LPDDR5, UFS 3.1, and effective cooling can achieve a higher final score than a device with the same chip using LPDDR4X and UFS 2.2.

When making a choice, the price of the smartphone, the type of memory, and cooling are more important than the Turbo prefix in the name. If a model with Dimensity 7360 is more expensive than a comparable device with Dimensity 7300, the new index alone does not justify the extra cost.

Basic

Label Name
MediaTek
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Launch Date
July 2025
Model Name
Dimensity 7360 (MT678V)
Architecture
4× Cortex-A78 up to 2.5 GHz + 4× Cortex-A55
Cores
Octa (8)
Technology
4 nm
Frequency
Up to 2.5 GHz

GPU Specifications

GPU name
Arm Mali-G615 MC2
Max display resolution
WFHD+ @ 120 Hz; FHD+ @ 144 Hz

Connectivity

4G support
LTE (FDD/TDD), 4G CA; WCDMA; TD-SCDMA; CDMA2000 1x/EVDO; GSM/EDGE
5G support
5G R16; NR DL 3CC (140 MHz); SA/NSA; DL up to 3.27 Gbps; 4×4 MIMO; 256QAM UL 2CC; VoNR / EPS fallback
Bluetooth
Bluetooth 5.4
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), 2×2 (2T2R)
Navigation
GPS; BeiDou; GLONASS; Galileo; QZSS; NavIC

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR5 / LPDDR4x
Memory frequency
Up to 6400 Mbps

Miscellaneous

Max camera resolution
Up to 200 MP
Storage type
UFS 3.1
Video capture
4K30 (3840 × 2160)
Video codecs
H.264, HEVC (encode/decode); VP9 (decode)
Video playback
H.264, HEVC, VP9 playback
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A (64-bit)
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 655 (6th gen)

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
1015
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
2932
AnTuTu 10
Score
715000

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
1354 +33.4%
774 -23.7%
415 -59.1%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
11100 +278.6%
4199 +43.2%
2038 -30.5%
1377 -53%
AnTuTu 10
1833453 +156.4%
988298 +38.2%
542331 -24.1%
431726 -39.6%