Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
MediaTek Helio G200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
and
MediaTek Helio G200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (5 nm vs 6 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2840 MHz (2840 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2025 (December 2020 vs May 2025)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
MediaTek
December 2020
Launch Date
May 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM8350
Model Name
Helio G200
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
6 nm
2840 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 660
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
840 MHz
GPU frequency
1100 MHz
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1408 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
32
2
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 2500 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 650 Mbps
LTE Cat. 22
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
-
5G support
No
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
8K at 30FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
10 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 888
1481
+96%
Helio G200
755
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 888
3794
+86%
Helio G200
2038
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 888
1754
+1180%
Helio G200
137
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
8231
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
3564
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
6230
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
2760
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
529
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
147
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
38350
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
28347
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
16735
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
10896
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-888-vs-mediatek-helio-g200" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Helio G200</a>