MediaTek Helio G200
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Helio G200
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: May 2025 (May 2025 vs October 2021)
- Higher Frequency: 2500 MHz (2200 MHz vs 2500 MHz)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Qualcomm
May 2025
Launch Date
October 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Helio G200
Model Name
SM7325-AE
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2200 MHz
Frequency
2500 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP2
GPU name
Adreno 642
1100 MHz
GPU frequency
550 MHz
0.1408 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.8448 TFLOPS
32
Shading units
384
-
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 650 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 3700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 13
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP
UFS 2.2
Storage type
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio G200
755
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069
+42%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio G200
2038
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008
+48%
FP32 (float)
Helio G200
137
Snapdragon 778G Plus
861
+528%
AnTuTu 10
Helio G200
435929
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344
+39%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
3564
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
6909
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
2760
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5463
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Tecno Camon 50
MediaTek Helio G200
164
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
3DMark Wild Life
Tecno Camon 50
MediaTek Helio G200
1421
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2799
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Tecno Camon 50
MediaTek Helio G200
409
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
768
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
MediaTek Helio G200
1408
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2642
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
28347
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
10896
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-helio-g200-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-778g-plus" target="_blank">MediaTek Helio G200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus</a>