Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 2500 MHz (2500 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: October 2021 (October 2021 vs May 2021)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Qualcomm
October 2021
Launch Date
May 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
-
SM7325-AE
Model Name
SM7325
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 642
GPU name
Adreno 642L
550 MHz
GPU frequency
490 MHz
0.8448 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
384
Shading units
384
2
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

Up to 3700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 1200 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
-
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
5 W
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069 +9%
Snapdragon 778G
981
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008 +8%
Snapdragon 778G
2787
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344 +1%
Snapdragon 778G
597891

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
6909
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6439
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5463
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5063
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4439
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4588
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5656
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5459
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7383
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6663
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
244
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
226
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2799
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2490
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
768
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
693
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2642
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2493
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272