Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
vs
Unisoc T820
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
and
Unisoc T820
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2700 MHz (2500 MHz vs 2700 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2022 (October 2021 vs November 2022)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Unisoc
October 2021
Launch Date
November 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM7325-AE
Model Name
T820
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
2700 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 642
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP4
550 MHz
GPU frequency
780 MHz
0.8448 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.4352 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
4
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
3440 x 1440
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 3700 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 15
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.0
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069
+40%
T820
764
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008
+31%
T820
2301
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 778G Plus
861
+94%
T820
444
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344
+25%
T820
482197
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
6909
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
4703
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5463
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
3626
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4439
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
3366
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
ZTE Nubia Neo 5G
Unisoc T820
206
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
27921
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441
ZTE Nubia Neo 5G
Unisoc T820
12776
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-778g-plus-vs-unisoc-t820" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Unisoc T820</a>