NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile: A Modest Workhorse for Basic Tasks and Games in 2025
An overview of the relevance of an outdated but still in-demand mobile graphics card.
Architecture and Key Features
Pascal Architecture: A Modest Legacy from 2016
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile graphics card is based on the Pascal architecture, which debuted in 2016. Despite being nearly a decade old, this technology is still found in budget laptops. The chip was manufactured using a 14nm process (by Samsung), which seems archaic in 2025 compared to NVIDIA's and AMD's 5nm and 4nm solutions.
What Can GTX 1050 Mobile Do?
The card is equipped with 640 CUDA cores and has a base clock speed of 1354 MHz (boost up to 1493 MHz). However, it lacks modern features such as ray tracing (RTX), DLSS, or support for FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR). This is a "pure" rasterization GPU without hardware acceleration for AI algorithms.
Who Is It Suitable For?
Pascal is ideal for undemanding users: it supports DirectX 12 (Feature Level 12_1) and Vulkan 1.3, but don’t expect advanced effects in new games.
Memory: Modest GDDR5 Potential
4 GB GDDR5: A Minimum for 2025
GTX 1050 Mobile utilizes 4 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 128-bit bus. Its bandwidth of 112 GB/s is 3-4 times lower than that of modern GDDR6/X solutions. In games with high-detail textures (like Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty), this is insufficient even at low settings—video memory fills up instantly, causing FPS drops.
Why Memory Volume Matters More Than Speed?
Even with a modest 128-bit bus, the main limitation has been the memory volume. For instance, in Hogwarts Legacy (2023) at 1080p and medium settings, the game consumes up to 3.8 GB of VRAM, but adding HD mods or enabling anti-aliasing exceeds the limit, leading to “lag”.
Gaming Performance: Realistic Expectations
1080p: A Comfortable Maximum
In 2025, the GTX 1050 Mobile is suitable for undemanding projects and esports disciplines. Examples of FPS (medium settings, 1080p):
- Counter-Strike 2 — 90–110 FPS;
- Valorant — 120–140 FPS;
- Fortnite (without RT and DLSS/FSR) — 45–55 FPS;
- Apex Legends — 50–60 FPS;
- GTA V — 70–80 FPS.
1440p and 4K: Forget About It
Even in older games like The Witcher 3, 1440p resolution drops the FPS to 25–35. 4K is out of the question—the card lacks DisplayPort 2.0 or HDMI 2.1, capping at 60 Hz at 4K through HDMI 2.0b.
Ray Tracing: Absent
Hardware RT support appeared only in Turing (GTX 16 series) and later. GTX 1050 Mobile will struggle even with hybrid rendering, like in Cyberpunk 2077 with FSR 3.1.
Professional Tasks: Minimal CUDA Performance
Video Editing and 3D Modeling
With 640 CUDA cores, the card accelerates rendering in Blender or Adobe Premiere Pro, but its power is only adequate for simple projects. For instance, rendering a 10-minute video in 1080p takes 25–30 minutes compared to 5–7 minutes with a modern RTX 4050 Mobile.
Scientific Computing: Inefficient
For machine learning tasks or simulations, at least 4 GB of VRAM and support for Tensor Cores are required, which the GTX 1050 Mobile lacks. It's better to use cloud services or external GPUs.
Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
TDP 40–50 W: Easy for Laptops
One of the main advantages of GTX 1050 Mobile is its low power consumption. It doesn't require a massive cooling system: even in thin ultrabooks, one fan and a compact heat sink suffice.
Cooling Tips
- Use cooling pads for gaming sessions.
- Regularly clean the ventilation grilles of dust.
- Avoid overclocking—thermal headroom is limited (maximum 94°C).
Comparison with Competitors
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile: Parity with Nuances
The closest AMD analog is the RX 560X (2017) with 4 GB of GDDR5. They show similar FPS in games, but AMD drivers are better optimized for Vulkan (e.g., Red Dead Redemption 2). However, the RX 560X consumes 10-15% more power.
NVIDIA GeForce MX 550: An Ambiguous Replacement
The more modern MX 550 (2022, Ampere architecture) is faster in applications due to 2048 CUDA cores, but it falls short in games due to a reduced memory bus (64 bits). Laptops with MX 550 start from $600, while used models with GTX 1050 Mobile can be found for $300–$400.
Conclusion: GTX 1050 Mobile is the choice for those looking for the cheapest laptop for basic tasks. Competitors are either more expensive or do not offer significant advantages.
Practical Tips
Power Supply: 65–90 W
The card is compatible with laptops without discrete power—it draws enough power through the motherboard. However, for stable operation, avoid cheap power supplies with unstable voltage.
Compatibility with Platforms
- Intel: Supports 7th-12th generation processors (optimal — i5-11300H);
- AMD: Best paired with Ryzen 5 5500U/5600U for a balance of price and performance.
Drivers: Don’t Update Unless Necessary
The latest Game Ready Drivers from NVIDIA (April 2025) officially support GTX 1050 Mobile, but FPS gains in new games are minimal. Sometimes older versions (e.g., 472.12) are more stable.
Pros and Cons
✅ Pros:
- Low power consumption.
- Availability in the second-hand market.
- Support for modern APIs (DirectX 12, Vulkan).
- Quiet cooling system operation.
❌ Cons:
- Weak for games of 2023+ years.
- No ray tracing or AI upscaling.
- Only 4 GB of video memory.
- Outdated 14nm manufacturing process.
Final Conclusion: Who Is GTX 1050 Mobile Suitable for in 2025?
This graphics card is an option for:
1. Students needing an affordable laptop for studies, occasional gaming, and presentation editing.
2. Office workers using a browser, Excel, and Zoom.
3. Retro gamers launching older titles (pre-2020).
4. Owners of external monitors with a resolution of 1080p@60Hz.
Why Should You Avoid It? If you plan to play Starfield or The Elder Scrolls VI—even on low settings, GTX 1050 Mobile won't deliver smooth FPS. In that case, consider laptops with RTX 3050 Ti (starting at $800) or utilize cloud gaming (GeForce NOW, Xbox Cloud).
Price: In 2025, laptops with GTX 1050 Mobile are only found in the second-hand market. Newer equivalents (with GTX 1650 Mobile) start at $550.
Final Verdict: A modest but reliable workhorse for those who value a balance of price and sufficient performance.