AMD Radeon Pro 460

AMD Radeon Pro 460: A Professional Tool in an Outdated Form Factor
Relevance as of April 2025
Introduction
The AMD Radeon Pro 460 is a discrete graphics card released in 2016 for mobile workstations, including some models of MacBook Pro. Despite its age, it still finds applications in niche solutions. In 2025, its relevance for gaming approaches zero, but it retains value for certain professional tasks. Let's examine who might find this GPU useful today.
1. Architecture and Key Features
Polaris Architecture: A Modest Foundation
The Radeon Pro 460 is built on the Polaris architecture (14 nm), which focuses on energy efficiency. Unlike modern AMD RDNA 3 or NVIDIA Ada Lovelace, Polaris does not support hardware ray tracing or AI acceleration.
Unique Features
- AMD FidelityFX: A post-processing suite (contrast sharpening, upscaling), but 2025 versions (e.g., FSR 3.0) are incompatible.
- Professional Drivers: Optimized for CAD, rendering, and scientific packages.
- FreeSync: Support for adaptive synchronization.
What’s Missing:
- Hardware ray tracing (no RTX equivalent).
- AI for upscaling (DLSS or FSR 3.0).
2. Memory: Modest Specs
- Type and Capacity: 4 GB GDDR5 with a 256-bit bus.
- Bandwidth: 81.6 GB/s.
For tasks in 2025, this is insufficient: even basic neural network models require at least 8 GB of VRAM. However, for working with 2D graphics or older 3D projects, the memory is adequate.
3. Gaming Performance: Nostalgia for the Past
The Radeon Pro 460 was not designed for gaming, but between 2016 and 2020, it handled projects like Overwatch or CS:GO. In 2025, its capabilities look like this:
- 1080p / Low Settings:
- Fortnite: 35-45 FPS (without FSR).
- Apex Legends: 25-30 FPS.
- Modern AAA Games: Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield — less than 20 FPS even on the lowest settings.
Ray Tracing: Not supported.
Advice: Consider this card only for indie games or retro projects.
4. Professional Tasks: Narrow Specialization
Video Editing
- Premiere Pro: Smooth rendering in 1080p, but 4K will cause lags.
- DaVinci Resolve: Accelerated color correction via OpenCL.
3D Modeling
- Blender / Maya: Average performance in polygon modeling. GPU rendering (Cycles) will take 3-4 times longer compared to modern cards.
Scientific Calculations
- OpenCL: Suitable for simple simulations (physics, bioinformatics), but lags behind NVIDIA CUDA in speed.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
- TDP: 35 watts — one of its main advantages.
- Cooling: Passive or compact cooler.
- Case Recommendations: Suitable for small form factor PCs with proper ventilation.
6. Comparison with Competitors
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M (2020)
- Pros: RDNA, 8 GB GDDR6, supports FSR 2.0.
- Cons: Higher price ($300+).
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (2020)
- Pros: CUDA cores, better for rendering.
- Cons: TDP 50 watts, more expensive ($350+).
Conclusion: The Pro 460 falls behind even models from 2020 but is cheaper (from $150 for new leftovers).
7. Practical Tips
- Power Supply: A 300-watt supply is sufficient.
- Compatibility:
- macOS: Best optimization (older MacBook Pro models).
- Windows / Linux: Specific drivers are required.
- Drivers: Use the "Pro" branch for stability in professional tasks.
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low power consumption.
- Stability in professional applications.
- Affordable price for basic tasks.
Cons:
- Outdated architecture.
- Insufficient VRAM for modern projects.
- Lack of support for new technologies (ray tracing, AI).
9. Final Conclusion: Who is the Radeon Pro 460 For?
This graphics card is suitable for:
1. Owners of older MacBook Pros who need an upgrade without system replacement.
2. Professionals working with 2D graphics or light 3D models.
3. Enthusiasts building budget PCs for office tasks.
Do not buy the Radeon Pro 460 if:
- You need to play modern games.
- You work with 4K video or neural networks.
In 2025, this is a specialized tool, not a universal solution. Its price is justified only in exceptional scenarios.