Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8500

vs
Samsung Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500 mobile chipset comparison

SoC Comparison Result

Samsung Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500: How Much Faster is Exynos

The Exynos 2600 is a significantly faster SoC, especially excelling in Single-Core and graphics tests. The Dimensity 8500 is a class below and is found in cheaper smartphones. Therefore, the question is not which processor is faster, but rather how large the difference is between devices on these platforms.

Difference Samsung Exynos 2600 MediaTek Dimensity 8500
Class flagship sub-flagship
Process technology Samsung 2 nm GAA 4 nm
CPU 10 cores 8 Cortex-A725 cores
Maximum frequency up to 3.8 GHz up to 3.4 GHz
GPU Xclipse 960 Mali-G720 MC8
Memory LPDDR5X LPDDR5X-9600

The Exynos 2600 is produced using Samsung's 2-nm GAA technology and features a 10-core Armv9.3 CPU architecture. The Dimensity 8500 is manufactured on a 4-nm process and uses eight Cortex-A725 cores clocked at up to 3.4 GHz. Both processors lack separate power-efficient Cortex-A5xx cores.

CPU Performance

In Geekbench 6, the Exynos 2600 shows significant speed improvements. The Galaxy S26 and S26+ score approximately 3060-3210 points in Single-Core and 10,400-11,000 points in Multi-Core. Devices equipped with the Dimensity 8500 score roughly between 1560-1680 and 6480-6640 points, respectively.

Smartphone Processor Geekbench 6 Single-Core Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Exynos 2600 3209 11 034
Samsung Galaxy S26 Exynos 2600 3060 10 388
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Dimensity 8500 1675 6642
POCO X8 Pro Dimensity 8500 1564 6478

The table lists the results of commercial smartphones in Geekbench 6. The Galaxy S26 outperforms the POCO X8 Pro by approximately 96% in Single-Core and 60% in Multi-Core.

The most significant performance gap is observed in Single-Core results. In Multi-Core, the advantage is smaller, but the Exynos 2600 is still around 60% faster.

In terms of speed, the Dimensity 8500 cannot compete with the Exynos 2600 - these processors belong to different classes.

Graphics and Gaming

The Exynos 2600 features the Xclipse 960 with hardware ray tracing. ENSS handles neural network upscaling and frame generation. The Dimensity 8500 is equipped with a Mali-G720 MC8, incorporating MediaTek HyperEngine technologies.

The performance advantage of the Xclipse 960 is further highlighted in 3DMark:

Smartphone GPU 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960 7206 3265
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960 7122 3211
POCO X8 Pro Mali-G720 MC8 4311 1563
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MC8 4011 1624

In Wild Life Extreme, the Xclipse 960 is approximately 65-80% faster, and in Steel Nomad Light, it is nearly double the performance. All four smartphones were tested under identical 3DMark tests, so this comparison is more accurate than cross-referencing results from different versions of AnTuTu.

In demanding games, the Exynos 2600 enables higher settings or a more stable frame rate. The Dimensity 8500 is notably weaker in terms of GPU power, though its performance is sufficient for most mobile games.

Heating and Stability Under Load

Under prolonged load, the dynamics change. In the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test, the POCO X8 Pro maintained 74.4% of its initial performance. The Galaxy S26 recorded 48.8%, the Galaxy S26+ about 59.6%, and the Motorola Edge 70 Pro around 48.9%.

Even after throttling, the Xclipse 960 may remain faster due to its significantly higher initial performance. However, under extended gaming stress, the gap narrows.

The stress test results are influenced not only by the SoC but also by cooling, chassis design, and manufacturer settings.

Samsung has specifically redesigned heat dissipation in the Exynos 2600. The chip’s body features a Heat Path Block for more efficient thermal management.

The process technology alone does not determine smartphone heating. The 2-nm process gives the Exynos 2600 a technological edge, but frequency stability depends on the cooling system of the specific device.

AI and Additional Features

The Exynos 2600 features an updated NPU for local AI tasks, including image processing and computer vision.

The Dimensity 8500 includes an NPU 880 that supports local generative models.

Currently, there is insufficient comparable NPU testing for a reliable percentage comparison. Therefore, the advantages of the Exynos in CPU and GPU performance should not be automatically assumed to extend to AI capabilities.

Conclusion

The Exynos 2600 is significantly faster than the Dimensity 8500 in CPU and especially in graphics performance, but there is an important practical difference: the Exynos 2600 is only used in Samsung smartphones, while the Dimensity 8500 is found in models from various brands and price categories.

As a result, the choice is determined not only by processor performance. If considering a Galaxy with the Exynos 2600, the buyer is getting a more powerful platform but is effectively choosing a Samsung smartphone. The Dimensity 8500 offers a wider selection of devices, which are usually less expensive.

At a similar price point, the advantages of the Exynos 2600 are evident. If the Galaxy is significantly more expensive, it is advisable to compare specific smartphones as a whole - considering the display, cameras, battery life, memory, and cooling, not just SoC performance results.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 2 nm (2 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 3400 MHz (3.8 GHz vs 3400 MHz)

Basic

Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2026
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9965
Model Name
Dimensity 8500
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
Architecture
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A725, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A725
10
Cores
8
2 nm
Technology
4 nm
3.8 GHz
Frequency
3400 MHz

GPU Specifications

Xclipse 960
GPU name
Mali-G720 MС8
-
Shading units
128
-
OpenCL version
3.2
-
Vulkan version
1.3
Up to 4K@120 Hz
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440

Connectivity

-
5G support
Yes
-
Bluetooth
5.4
-
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
-
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
-
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
-
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

-
Audio codecs
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3
Up to 320 MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 4 + MCQ
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
Video codecs
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 880

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2600
3150 +86%
Dimensity 8500
1693
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2600
11100 +61%
Dimensity 8500
6897