MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8500

vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500 mobile chipset comparison

SoC Comparison Result

MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500: Old Hit vs. New Generation

The MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra was one of the most successful chips in its class. It was featured in smartphones like the POCO X6 Pro and brought almost flagship performance to a more affordable segment.

The Dimensity 8500 is a more modern platform. The main difference is not just a slight increase in frequency but in the new CPU based on Cortex-A725, the Mali-G720 MC8 graphics, faster memory, and NPU 880. The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is still good, but compared to the 8500, it looks like a chip from the previous generation.

Key Differences

Specification Dimensity 8300 Ultra Dimensity 8500
CPU 4x Cortex-A715 + 4x Cortex-A510 8x Cortex-A725
CPU Architecture big.LITTLE all-big-core
L3 Cache 4 MB 6 MB
GPU Mali-G615 MC6 Mali-G720 MC8
NPU NPU 780 NPU 880
Memory LPDDR5X up to 8533 Mbps LPDDR5X up to 9600 Mbps
Display WQHD+ up to 120 Hz / FHD+ up to 180 Hz WQHD+ up to 144 Hz

From the table, it is clear that the Dimensity 8500 is stronger not in just one separate part but almost across the entire platform. It has a more modern CPU, a wider graphics block, faster memory, larger L3 cache, and higher support for WQHD+ frequency. The NPU 880 is also important, but more as a basis for local AI features than as a main selling point for smartphones today.

CPU Section

The Dimensity 8300 Ultra uses a 4+4 architecture: four powerful Cortex-A715 and four energy-efficient Cortex-A510. At its time, this was a very successful configuration. The chip quickly opens apps, manages multitasking well, and does not appear weak even against newer mid-range solutions.

The Dimensity 8500 shifts to a different philosophy - eight Cortex-A725 cores without the smaller Cortex-A510. This all-big-core scheme means that even the smaller cores remain powerful, simply operating at lower frequencies. In heavy tasks, this approach provides more headroom: rendering, unpacking, photo processing, running multiple apps, and CPU-intensive gaming should run more reliably.

In practice, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is still fast, but the Dimensity 8500 is better suited for prolonged loads, especially when talking about more than just social networks and browsers, but also heavy gaming, camera work, and constant multitasking.

Graphics and Gaming

The difference in graphics is no longer superficial. The Dimensity 8300 Ultra uses the Mali-G615 MC6, while the Dimensity 8500 uses the Mali-G720 MC8. This is not just a matter of having more cores; it marks a transition to a newer generation of GPUs from ARM.

The Mali-G615 MC6 is capable graphics for a strong mid-range. It is based on the fourth generation of Valhall architecture and supports Variable Rate Shading. This helped the Dimensity 8300 Ultra establish a good gaming reputation: the chip handles heavy projects noticeably better than many standard mid-range SoCs while remaining quite economical.

The Mali-G720 MC8 in the Dimensity 8500 is already a step further. This is a fifth-generation GPU, featuring a configuration with 8 cores compared to 6 in the Mali-G615 MC6. The Mali-G720 also includes Deferred Vertex Shading - a new geometry processing scheme that helps achieve better visuals within the same power budget. For gaming, this is more important than just the peak FPS numbers in the first minutes; stability after heating up matters too.

Simply put, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is still good for gaming, but the Dimensity 8500 offers more headroom for high settings, 120/144 Hz, and heavier projects. In synthetic benchmarks, the gap in GPU performance often appears significant: in AnTuTu, the graphic score for the Dimensity 8500 can be approximately 45-50% higher. In real games, the outcome will depend on the smartphone cooling, but the GPU itself in the 8500 is noticeably more modern and powerful.

Benchmarks

Test Dimensity 8300 Ultra / 8300 Dimensity 8500 Approximate Difference
AnTuTu 11 Overall ~1.6 million ~2.15 million +30-35%
AnTuTu 11 CPU ~466 thousand ~623 thousand +30-35%
AnTuTu 11 GPU ~465 thousand ~687 thousand +45-50%
Geekbench 6 Single-Core ~1375 ~1720 +25%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core ~4215 ~6715 +55-60%
Geekbench 6 GPU Compute ~9370 ~13460 +40-45%

These figures are best viewed as a reference. The same chip might show different results in different smartphones: cooling, firmware, power limits, RAM, and the case all play a role.

The main significance of benchmarks isn’t in single-core performance, where the difference is moderate, but in multi-core and GPU performance. The Dimensity 8500 is noticeably stronger exactly where the load is prolonged and heavy: gaming, photo and video processing, multitasking, unpacking, rendering, and computational tasks.

Final Choice

The Dimensity 8300 Ultra cannot be considered weak. It's a successful chip that has well-survived the generational shift and still competes better than many mid-range competitors. If a smartphone with this chip is significantly cheaper, it can be a solid choice for gaming, daily tasks, photography, videography, and heavy applications.

The Dimensity 8500 seems like the better option at a similar price point. This is not a minor upgrade from the Dimensity 8300 Ultra, but a full step forward: all-big-core CPU, Mali-G720 MC8, NPU 880, 6 MB L3, and LPDDR5X 9600. It is faster in multithreading, significantly stronger in graphics, and better suited for heavy gaming and prolonged loads.

The main takeaway is simple: The Dimensity 8300 Ultra makes sense if it is significantly cheaper. If the price difference is small, it is better to choose the Dimensity 8500.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 3400 MHz (3350 MHz vs 3400 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (November 2023 vs January 2026)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
November 2023
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Dimensity 8300 ultra
Model Name
Dimensity 8500
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A725, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A725
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
3400 MHz

GPU Specifications

Mali-G615 MP6
GPU name
Mali-G720 MС8
1400 MHz
GPU frequency
-
-
Shading units
128
2.0
OpenCL version
3.2
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440

Connectivity

Yes
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4266 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4 + MCQ
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
-
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
MediaTek APU 780
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 880

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1506
Dimensity 8500
1693 +12%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4844
Dimensity 8500
6897 +42%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1518170
Dimensity 8500
2359462 +55%