MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
vs
Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
and
Samsung Exynos 2600
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3400 MHz (3400 MHz vs 3.8 GHz)
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (4 nm vs 2 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (May 2025 vs January 2026)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
May 2025
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
Dimensity 9400e
Model Name
S5E9965
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4, 3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4, 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
Architecture
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
2 nm
3400 MHz
Frequency
3.8 GHz
22.7
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU name
Xclipse 960
1300 MHz
GPU frequency
-
3.9936 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
-
3.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
Up to 4K@120 Hz
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 7300 Mbps
Download speed
-
Yes
5G support
-
6.0
Bluetooth
-
7
Wi-Fi
-
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
-
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4266 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
-
Miscellaneous
8 MB
L3 cache
-
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
Audio codecs
-
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
Up to 320 MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video capture
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
MediaTek NPU 790
Neural processor (NPU)
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9400e
2188
Exynos 2600
3150
+44%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9400e
7403
Exynos 2600
11100
+50%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Realme GT 7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
8039
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
12698
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Realme GT 7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
1919
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Realme GT 7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
37377
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
19726
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-9400e-vs-samsung-exynos-2600" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs Samsung Exynos 2600</a>