Samsung Exynos 2100
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2100
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2022 (December 2020 vs January 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
December 2020
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9840
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP14
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
854 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
1.5304 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
640
14
Execution units
3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
8 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2100
1474
Exynos 2200
1594
+8%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2100
3334
Exynos 2200
3685
+11%
FP32 (float)
Exynos 2100
1499
Exynos 2200
3172
+112%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2100
579331
Exynos 2200
902026
+56%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
7859
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
8624
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
398
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
5715
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
1800
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
6072
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
27774
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
13280
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
1562
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2100-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>