Samsung Exynos 2100
vs
Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2100
and
Samsung Exynos 2600
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 3.8 GHz)
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (5 nm vs 2 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (December 2020 vs January 2026)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
December 2020
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
S5E9840
Model Name
S5E9965
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
8
Cores
10
5 nm
Technology
2 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
3.8 GHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP14
GPU name
Xclipse 960
854 MHz
GPU frequency
-
1.5304 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
64
Shading units
-
14
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
Up to 4K@120 Hz
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
-
5.2
Bluetooth
-
6
Wi-Fi
-
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
-
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
-
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
-
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
Up to 320 MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
8 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2100
1474
Exynos 2600
3150
+114%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2100
3334
Exynos 2600
11100
+233%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
398
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
5715
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20523
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
1800
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
5171
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
6072
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
7519
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
27774
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos 2100)
Samsung Exynos 2100
13280
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2100-vs-samsung-exynos-2600" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 2600</a>