Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (3200 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: April 2025 (April 2025 vs January 2022)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
April 2025
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM8735
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 825
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
1150 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
640
-
Execution units
3
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 4200 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.0
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2.75 MB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 cache
-
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
-
TDP
7 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Hexagon
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
2116
+33%
Exynos 2200
1594
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
7082
+92%
Exynos 2200
3685
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
2230196
+147%
Exynos 2200
902026
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
18295
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
21083
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Solar Bay
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
8191
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4421
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
803
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
515
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
8042
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4604
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
1820
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
1804
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Meizu 22
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
217741
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
17084
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-8s-gen-4-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>