Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (6 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2800 MHz (2400 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2022 (May 2021 vs January 2022)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
May 2021
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM7325
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
4 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 642L
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
490 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
640
2
Execution units
3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
5 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G
981
Exynos 2200
1594
+62%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G
2787
Exynos 2200
3685
+32%
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G
597891
Exynos 2200
902026
+51%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5459
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6663
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
226
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2490
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
693
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2493
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
688
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-778g-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>