Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2200
and
Samsung Exynos 2600
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2800 MHz (2800 MHz vs 3.8 GHz)
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (4 nm vs 2 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (January 2022 vs January 2026)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
January 2022
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
S5E9925
Model Name
S5E9965
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
2 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
3.8 GHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU name
Xclipse 960
810 MHz
GPU frequency
-
3.1104 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
640
Shading units
-
3
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.1
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
Up to 4K@120 Hz
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
-
5.2
Bluetooth
-
6
Wi-Fi
-
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
-
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
-
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
-
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
Up to 320 MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video playback
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
7 W
TDP
-
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2200
1594
Exynos 2600
3150
+98%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2200
3685
Exynos 2600
11100
+201%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4421
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
12698
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-samsung-exynos-2600" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 2600</a>