MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (3350 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2023 (November 2023 vs January 2022)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
November 2023
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 8300 ultra
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G615 MP6
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
1400 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
640
-
Execution units
3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
Yes
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4266 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
-
TDP
7 W
-
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
MediaTek APU 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1506
Exynos 2200
1594
+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4844
+31%
Exynos 2200
3685
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1518170
+68%
Exynos 2200
902026
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
10420
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
9580
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Solar Bay
Alldocube iPlay 80 mini Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4863
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4421
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
509
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
515
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4869
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4604
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Alldocube iPlay 80 mini Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1209
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1162
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
9801
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Alldocube iPlay 80 mini Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
2968
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
11135
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
41915
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
13978
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8300-ultra-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>