MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 6 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (3350 MHz vs 2500 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: November 2023 (November 2023 vs October 2021)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
Qualcomm
November 2023
Launch Date
October 2021
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Dimensity 8300 ultra
Model Name
SM7325-AE
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
6 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
2500 MHz

GPU Specifications

Mali-G615 MP6
GPU name
Adreno 642
1400 MHz
GPU frequency
550 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.8448 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
384
-
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12.1

Connectivity

-
Download speed
Up to 3700 Mbps
Yes
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4266 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

-
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
5 W
-
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
MediaTek APU 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1506 +41%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4844 +61%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1518170 +151%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
10420
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5656
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
9580
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7383
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1182
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1162
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
244
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
9801
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2799
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
2773
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
768
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
11135
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2642
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
41915
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
13978
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441