Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
Samsung Exynos 2100

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and Samsung Exynos 2100 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2840 MHz vs 2900 MHz)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
December 2020
Launch Date
December 2020
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM8350
Model Name
S5E9840
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
5 nm
2840 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 660
GPU name
Mali-G78 MP14
840 MHz
GPU frequency
854 MHz
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.5304 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
14
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 22
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Hexagon 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
10 W
TDP
8 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 888
1481 +0%
Exynos 2100
1474
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 888
3794 +14%
Exynos 2100
3334
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 888
1754 +17%
Exynos 2100
1499