Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8200

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and MediaTek Dimensity 8200 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (2840 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: December 2022 (December 2020 vs December 2022)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
MediaTek
December 2020
Launch Date
December 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM8350
Model Name
MT6896Z
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2840 MHz
Frequency
3100 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 660
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP6
840 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.442 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
-
2
Execution units
6
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
-

Connectivity

Up to 2500 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 22
4G support
LTE Cat. 21
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
10 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon 780
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 580

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 888
1481 +21%
Dimensity 8200
1229
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 888
3794
Dimensity 8200
3892 +3%
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 888
1754 +24%
Dimensity 8200
1413
AiTuTu 3
Snapdragon 888
503622 +327%
Dimensity 8200
117961

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9612
Vivo V30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9417
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
11106
Unihertz 8849 Tank 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10881
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
529
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Vivo V27 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6567
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1548
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1790
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6519
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
38350
Cubot Max 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
34102
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
16735
Oukitel WP200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
14061
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1523
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1751