AMD Radeon R9 380

AMD Radeon R9 380 in 2025: Is it worth considering this graphics card?
Overview of capabilities, performance, and relevance for modern tasks
Architecture and Key Features
GCN 1.2: A Legacy of the Past
The AMD Radeon R9 380, released in 2015, is based on the Graphics Core Next (GCN) 1.2 architecture. This is the third generation of GCN, optimized for improved energy efficiency and performance in DirectX 12. The manufacturing process is 28 nm, which is considered outdated by 2025 standards (modern GPUs use 5–7 nm).
Lack of Modern Features
The card does not support ray tracing (RTX) or similar AMD technologies like FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) that emerged later. However, it is compatible with the Mantle API and partially with Vulkan, which provided advantages in optimized projects during its prime.
Memory: Type, Size, and Impact on Performance
GDDR5: Moderate Bandwidth
The R9 380 is equipped with GDDR5 memory of either 2 or 4 GB (depending on the version) with a 256-bit bus. The bandwidth is 182 GB/s. This was sufficient for games from 2015 to 2018, but in 2025, even 4 GB becomes a critical minimum. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) at medium settings in 1080p, the graphics card "consumes" over 3.5 GB of VRAM, causing FPS drops.
Usage Tips
For comfortable operation in 2025, it is recommended to:
- Play older or less demanding titles (CS2, Dota 2, Indie games).
- Avoid ultra texture packs in AAA games.
Gaming Performance
1080p: Acceptable for Light Tasks
In 2025, the R9 380 manages games at low-medium settings:
- Fortnite: 45–55 FPS (Low, 1080p).
- Apex Legends: 40–50 FPS (Medium, 1080p).
- The Witcher 3: 30–35 FPS (Medium, 1080p).
1440p and 4K: Not Recommended
Even in Rocket League (1440p, High), FPS drops to 40–45. The card is unsuitable for 4K due to VRAM shortage and weak computational power.
Ray Tracing: No Support
The R9 380 is incompatible with hardware ray tracing, and software emulation (e.g., Proton for Linux) reduces FPS to unacceptable levels.
Professional Tasks
OpenCL and Limitations
The card supports OpenCL 1.2, allowing its use in rendering (Blender), video editing (DaVinci Resolve), or scientific calculations. However, its performance is significantly lower than modern solutions:
- Blender (Cycles): Rendering a BMW scene takes approximately 45 minutes compared to 5–7 minutes with an RX 7600.
- Lack of CUDA: It cannot be used in Adobe Premiere Pro for render acceleration.
Conclusion: The R9 380 is suitable only for basic tasks or as a temporary solution.
Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
TDP 190W: A Hungry "Veteran"
Under maximum load, the card consumes up to 190W. In comparison, the modern RX 6600 (100W) delivers twice the FPS.
Cooling Recommendations
- A case with good ventilation (2–3 intake fans).
- Minimum power supply: 500W (with overhead for peak loads).
- Replace thermal paste every 2–3 years (relevant for used models).
Comparison with Competitors
Direct Competitors of 2015
- NVIDIA GTX 960 (4 GB): Comparable in performance but more energy-efficient (120W TDP).
- AMD R9 290: More powerful but hotter (250W TDP).
In 2025
Even budget newcomers like the Intel Arc A380 ($120) or RX 6400 ($130) surpass the R9 380 in energy efficiency and support for modern APIs (DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.3).
Practical Tips
Power Supply and Compatibility
- Minimum PSU: 500W (80+ Bronze).
- Compatibility: PCIe 3.0 x16 (works in PCIe 4.0/5.0, but without speed boost).
Drivers: Caution!
Official support from AMD ended in 2021. An enthusiast community releases unofficial patches, but stability is not guaranteed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low price (if you find a new unit -- around $100).
- Support for Multi-GPU (CrossFire) for experimental users.
Cons:
- Outdated architecture.
- High power consumption.
- No support for modern technologies (FSR 3, Ray Tracing).
Final Conclusion: Who is the R9 380 For?
This graphics card is a choice for:
1. Budget Builds: If you need a temporary GPU for office tasks or older games.
2. Retro Hardware Enthusiasts: For collectors or modding fans.
3. Second PCs: For streaming servers or media centers.
Alternative in 2025: With a budget of $150–200, it’s better to get a new RX 6500 XT or Intel Arc A580 — they will provide support for modern technologies with half the energy consumption.
Conclusion
The AMD Radeon R9 380 is a legend of the mid-2010s, but by 2025, its time has passed. It may serve as a nostalgic artifact or a temporary solution, but for serious tasks, opting for something current is advisable.