NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX: Architectural Relic or Budget Solution in 2025?
Review of an outdated GPU for enthusiasts and owners of old systems
1. Architecture and Key Features
Kepler Architecture: Technologies from 2012
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX, released in 2012, is built on the Kepler architecture (GK106 chip) using a 28 nm manufacturing process. This is a mobile version designed for laptops, focusing on a balance between performance and energy efficiency. Unlike modern GPUs like the RTX 40 series, it lacks key technologies:
- RTX (ray tracing) and DLSS (artificial intelligence for upscaling) — these didn’t exist during the Kepler era.
- FidelityFX (AMD's optimization package) is also not supported as it's a competitor's solution.
Key features include support for DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.5, and PhysX, which seem archaic in 2025. The card is suited for basic tasks and games from the past decade.
2. Memory: Modest Specifications by Modern Standards
- Type and Volume: 3 GB GDDR5 — in 2025, this is insufficient even for less demanding games. Modern titles require at least 6–8 GB.
- Bus and Bandwidth: The 192-bit bus provides up to 96 GB/s. In comparison, even the budget RTX 3050 (128-bit, GDDR6) offers 224 GB/s.
- Impact on Performance: The lack of memory capacity and low bandwidth limits performance at resolutions above 1080p. In games with HD textures, FPS drops can occur due to VRAM overload.
3. Gaming Performance: Nostalgia for the Past
In 2025, the GTX 670MX is only suitable for older titles and indie games. Examples of average FPS (on low settings, 1080p):
- CS:GO — 60–80 FPS (but in competitive modes on low settings).
- The Witcher 3 — 25–30 FPS (at minimum settings).
- GTA V — 35–40 FPS (medium settings).
Resolution Support:
- 1080p — acceptable for games up to 2015.
- 1440p and 4K — not recommended even for video playback due to lack of hardware decoding for modern codecs (AV1, VP9).
Ray Tracing: Not supported. For comparison, even the GTX 16 series (2019) lacks RT cores.
4. Professional Tasks: Very Limited Potential
- Video Editing: Editing in DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro is only feasible for 1080p projects. Rendering will take 3–5 times longer than on modern GPUs.
- 3D Modeling: In Blender or Maya, the card can handle simple scenes, but Cycles on CUDA (supported by 960 cores) will work very slowly.
- Scientific Calculations: CUDA and OpenCL are functional, but less efficient than modern integrated solutions (e.g., Apple M3).
For professionals, the GTX 670MX in 2025 is a relic.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
- TDP: 75 W — a modest figure even for 2010s laptops.
- Cooling: Owners of older laptops should regularly clean the fans and replace the thermal paste. Under load, temperatures can reach 85–90°C.
- PC Cases: For the desktop version (if used via an external eGPU enclosure), a power supply of at least 300 W is required.
6. Comparison with Competitors
In its niche (mobile GPUs from 2012-2013), the GTX 670MX competed with the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (2 GB GDDR5):
- Performance: In games, NVIDIA had a 10–15% advantage due to driver optimizations.
- Energy Efficiency: AMD ran hotter (TDP 100 W).
- Modern Analogues: By 2025, both cards are hopelessly outdated. The budget GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6) is 3–4 times faster.
7. Practical Advice for Users
- Power Supply: For laptops — use the original adapter. For eGPU — a PSU of 300 W or more.
- Compatibility: Only systems with PCIe 2.0/3.0. Windows 10/11 (drivers updated until 2021).
- Drivers: Use the latest version from NVIDIA (v471.xx) — support has been discontinued.
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low price on the secondary market ($20–40).
- CUDA support for older professional applications.
Cons:
- Lack of memory and performance for modern tasks.
- No support for new technologies (RTX, DLSS, AV1).
- High risk of overheating in older laptops.
9. Final Conclusion: Who is the GTX 670MX Suitable for in 2025?
This graphics card is a choice for:
1. Owners of old laptops who want to extend the life of their devices for basic tasks (office work, browsing, YouTube).
2. Retro gaming enthusiasts reminiscing about projects from the 2000s to 2010s.
3. Budget-conscious users: If a temporary GPU is needed for a PC without integrated graphics.
Why it’s not worth buying for newcomers? Even budget Intel Arc A380 or AMD RX 6400 (from $120) offer 5–7 times the performance, support for modern APIs and technologies. The GTX 670MX in 2025 is a museum piece, not a working tool.