AMD Radeon R9 M385X

AMD Radeon R9 M385X: Review of an Outdated Mobile GPU in 2025
April 2025
Although the AMD Radeon R9 M385X was released nearly a decade ago, this mobile graphics card can still be found in used laptops and budget systems. Its relevance in 2025 is debatable, but for specific tasks, it can still be useful. Let's explore who this model is suitable for and what compromises one will have to accept.
1. Architecture and Key Features
Foundation: 3rd Generation GCN
The Radeon R9 M385X is built on the 3rd Generation Graphics Core Next (GCN) architecture, which at the time provided a good balance between performance and energy efficiency. The manufacturing process is 28 nm, which by today's standards (5–3 nm for 2025 flagships) looks outdated.
Unique Features
The card supports AMD technologies like Mantle (the predecessor to Vulkan) and TrueAudio for enhanced sound in games. However, it lacks modern features such as FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) 3.0 or hardware ray tracing. For performance improvement in older projects, Radeon Image Sharpening can be utilized, but its effectiveness is limited due to weak computational power.
2. Memory: Modest Specifications for 2025
- Memory Type: GDDR5.
- Capacity: 4 GB.
- Bus: 128-bit.
- Bandwidth: 96 GB/s (memory frequency — 1500 MHz).
This is sufficient for games from the 2010s at medium settings, but in modern projects (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty or Starfield), 4 GB of VRAM becomes a bottleneck. Even when using FSR 2.0 (if supported by the game), high-resolution textures can lead to FPS drops due to a lack of VRAM.
3. Performance in Games: Nostalgia for the Past
The R9 M385X is a choice for casual gamers. Here are examples of FPS in popular games (settings Medium, 1080p):
- CS:GO: 90–110 FPS.
- GTA V: 45–55 FPS.
- Overwatch 2: 40–50 FPS (with FSR 2.0 — up to 60 FPS).
- The Witcher 3: 30–35 FPS.
At resolutions above 1080p (1440p, 4K), the card is impractical: even in Fortnite at 1440p, FPS will drop to 20–25. There is no hardware-level ray tracing, and emulation through drivers (if available) will significantly reduce performance to unacceptable levels.
4. Professional Tasks: Minimal Capabilities
The card is still suitable for basic tasks:
- Video Editing: Working in DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro with 1080p/30 FPS footage is possible, but rendering will take a lot of time.
- 3D Modeling: Blender and AutoCAD will run, but complex scenes will lag. It's better to use OpenCL mode instead of CUDA.
- Scientific Computations: Support for OpenCL 1.2 allows for simple simulations, but there is insufficient power for machine learning or rendering neural networks.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
- TDP: 75 W.
- Cooling Recommendations: Dust cleaning of the cooling system in laptops with this card is critically important. For desktop PCs (if the card is used in an external box), cases with 2–3 fans will suffice.
6. Comparison with Competitors
Analogues of the R9 M385X from 2015–2016:
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M: Better optimized for DirectX 11 but lags in OpenCL tasks.
- AMD Radeon R9 M395X: 15–20% more powerful but more expensive.
- Intel Iris Xe (2025): Integrated graphics of modern Intel processors are already catching up with the R9 M385X in gaming while consuming less power.
7. Practical Tips
- Power Supply: For laptops — the original 90–120W adapter. For external use (via Thunderbolt), ensure the PC's power supply delivers at least 300W.
- Compatibility: The card works only with PCIe 3.0 x8. There may be limitations on motherboards with PCIe 5.0.
- Drivers: Official support by AMD ended in 2021. Use the latest available version (Adrenalin 21.5.2) or community projects (like AMDVLK).
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low price on the secondary market ($50–80).
- Supports MultiMonitor (up to 4 displays).
- Sufficient for office tasks and older games.
Cons:
- No support for modern APIs (DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.3).
- High power consumption for its capabilities.
- Limited compatibility with new OS (e.g., Windows 11 requires workarounds).
9. Final Verdict: Who is the R9 M385X Suitable for in 2025?
This graphics card is an option for:
- Owners of old laptops who want to prolong their life for office applications.
- Retro gaming enthusiasts looking to run projects from the 2000s-2010s without upgrades.
- Budget users seeking a temporary solution until purchasing a modern PC.
However, for gaming in 2025, professional video editing, or working with AI, the R9 M385X is hopelessly outdated. If your budget allows, consider the integrated graphics of Ryzen 8000G or budget discrete cards like the Radeon RX 7600M.
Conclusion
The Radeon R9 M385X is a relic of the past, a reminder of the GPU progress over the last decade. It should only be considered as a temporary solution or part of a nostalgic project. For any serious tasks in 2025, more modern solutions are required.