AMD Radeon Pro 560X

AMD Radeon Pro 560X: A Professional Tool or an Outdated Solution?
April 2025
Introduction
The AMD Radeon Pro 560X has been on the market for several years, yet it still raises questions among users. This product is positioned as a professional GPU for workstations and creative tasks, but how does it cope with modern challenges? In this article, we will examine all aspects of the card—from its architecture to practical usage recommendations.
Architecture and Key Features
Polaris: A Legacy of the Past
The Radeon Pro 560X is built on the Polaris architecture (GCN 4th generation), which debuted back in 2016. The manufacturing process is 14 nm, which appears archaic by 2025 standards. In the era of 5 nm chips from NVIDIA and AMD, this limits energy efficiency and potential for scaling.
Unique Features
The card supports AMD technologies such as FidelityFX, including:
- FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) 1.0 — performance enhancement through upscaling (but not as advanced as FSR 3.0).
- Radeon Image Sharpening — image clarity enhancement.
There is no hardware support for Ray Tracing (RT cores) or NVIDIA's equivalent of DLSS. For professional tasks, Vulkan API and OpenCL 2.0 are relevant, but the card cannot support modern standards like DirectX 12 Ultimate.
Memory: Modest Capabilities
Specifications
- Memory Type: GDDR5 (not GDDR6 or HBM).
- Capacity: 4 GB.
- Bus: 256-bit.
- Bandwidth: 224 GB/s (memory clock speed of 7 GHz).
Impact on Performance
4 GB of memory in 2025 is a considerable drawback. For example, rendering 3D scenes in Blender with 8K textures or working with 4K footage in DaVinci Resolve will result in slowdowns. In gaming, memory capacity limits graphical settings: even at 1080p, projects like Cyberpunk 2077 will require lower texture quality.
Gaming Performance: Suitable Only for Undemanding Tasks
FPS Examples (1080p, Medium Settings):
- CS2: 90–110 FPS.
- Fortnite (without Ray Tracing): 50–60 FPS.
- Red Dead Redemption 2: 30–35 FPS.
- Hogwarts Legacy: 25–30 FPS (requires FSR for play).
Resolutions Above 1080p
- 1440p: Only for older games (e.g., The Witcher 3 — 40 FPS on medium).
- 4K: Not recommended — drops to 15–20 FPS even with FSR.
Ray Tracing
Hardware ray tracing is absent. Software emulation via FidelityFX GI is possible but provides minimal visual improvement at a significant load on the GPU.
Professional Tasks: Narrow Specialization
Video Editing
In Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve, the card shows modest results:
- Rendering 1080p video: 1.5–2x real-time.
- 4K timeline: lagging may occur without proxy files.
3D Modeling and Rendering
- Blender: OpenCL rendering is slower than NVIDIA (due to the lack of CUDA). For example, rendering a BMW scene takes about 25 minutes compared to approximately 12 minutes on an RTX 3050.
- SolidWorks: Stable performance, but complex assemblies require optimization.
Scientific Calculations
Support for OpenCL allows the GPU to be used in machine learning (on basic models), but 4 GB of memory limits data sizes.
Power Consumption and Heat Generation
- TDP: 100 W.
- Cooling Recommendations:
- Case with 2–3 fans for ventilation.
- A tower with a front air intake is preferable (e.g., Fractal Design Meshify C).
- The card is not suitable for compact PCs—minimum length of 200 mm.
Comparison with Competitors
AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Pros: 8 GB GDDR6, RDNA 1.0, PCIe 4.0 support.
- Cons: Price ($450) compared to $300–350 for the Pro 560X.
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Pros: CUDA cores, better rendering software.
- Cons: 4 GB GDDR6, more expensive ($400).
Gaming Alternatives (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650)
- Price: $170–200.
- Games: Comparable performance, but no professional drivers.
Practical Tips
Power Supply
Minimum of 450 W (recommended 500 W for headroom). Examples:
- Corsair CX550 (80+ Bronze).
- Be Quiet! System Power 10.
Compatibility
- macOS: Supported in older Mac Pro (2019) and Hackintosh.
- Platforms: Works better on PCIe 3.0 but is compatible with 4.0.
Drivers
Use Pro drivers (stability is more important than freshness). Avoid Adrenalin Edition—potential conflicts in work applications.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Affordable price for the professional segment ($300–350).
- Reliability and long service life.
- Good support for OpenCL and professional software.
Cons:
- Outdated architecture and 14 nm manufacturing process.
- Only 4 GB of memory.
- No hardware Ray Tracing.
Conclusion: Who Is the Radeon Pro 560X Suitable For?
This card is a choice for budget-conscious professional users who need stability rather than maximum performance. It is suitable for:
- Freelancers working with 2D graphics and simple 3D.
- Engineers for CAD applications.
- Owners of older Mac Pros looking to upgrade.
Gamers and those working with 4K/8K content should consider more modern solutions (such as the Radeon Pro W7600 or NVIDIA RTX 4060). In 2025, the Radeon Pro 560X remains a niche product, but it is still relevant for its intended tasks.
Publication date: April 2025.