AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP: Budget Classic in 2025
An overview of the capabilities, advantages, and disadvantages of the graphics card for cost-conscious users
Introduction
Despite being released back in 2015, the AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP remains functional due to its affordability and energy efficiency. In 2025, it is positioned as a solution for basic tasks, office PCs, and retro gaming enthusiasts. But how relevant is it today? Let's delve into the details.
Architecture and Key Features
Architecture: The graphics processor is built on the GCN 1.0 (Graphics Core Next) microarchitecture, which at the time provided AMD with competitiveness. However, by 2025, GCN has noticeably aged in comparison to RDNA 3/4 and NVIDIA Ada Lovelace.
Manufacturing Process: The 28nm process technology is characteristic of budget GPUs from the mid-2010s. This explains the modest performance and relatively high (by modern standards) thermal output.
Features:
- Support for DirectX 12 (Feature Level 11_1) and OpenGL 4.4.
- Lack of modern technologies such as FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) or hardware ray tracing.
- Basic support for Vulkan 1.0, limiting compatibility with newer games.
Memory: Modest, but Adequate for Its Tasks
Type and Size: The card is equipped with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus. This is sufficient for office applications and less demanding games, but for modern projects, even at low settings, the memory is insufficient.
Bandwidth: 72 GB/s — a figure that appears outdated in 2025. In comparison, even budget cards like the RX 6400 offer 128 GB/s.
Impact on Performance: The limited bandwidth and memory size become a bottleneck in games with highly detailed textures (for example, Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield).
Gaming Performance: Nostalgia for the Past
The R7 350 640SP is a choice for those not chasing ultra settings. Examples of FPS in popular games (Low/Medium settings, 1080p):
- CS2: 45-60 FPS (without anti-aliasing).
- Fortnite: 30-40 FPS (Performance mode).
- GTA V: 35-50 FPS.
- The Witcher 3: 25-30 FPS.
Resolutions:
- 1080p: Comfortable only for older or optimized projects.
- 1440p and 4K: Not recommended — lack of memory and computational power.
Ray Tracing: No hardware support. Software solutions (like through Proton or emulators) drop FPS to unacceptable levels.
Professional Tasks: Minimal Capabilities
The card is not meant for serious work, but can handle basic tasks:
- Video Editing: Simple projects in DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro (up to 1080p resolution). Rendering is slow due to lack of AV1 hardware encoding.
- 3D Modeling: Blender and AutoCAD — only for educational purposes. OpenCL acceleration works, but is much slower than modern GPUs.
- Scientific Calculations: Inefficient due to the low number of stream processors (640 compared to thousands in RDNA 3).
Power Consumption and Thermal Output
TDP: 55W — one of the main advantages of the card. It does not require powerful cooling and fits well in compact cases.
Recommendations:
- Cooling: A passive heatsink or a single 80mm fan is sufficient even under load.
- Case: It’s better to use systems with good ventilation to avoid thermal throttling.
Comparison with Competitors
In its segment ($70-100), the R7 350 640SP competes with:
- NVIDIA GT 1030 (GDDR5): Comparable performance, but the GT 1030 supports newer drivers.
- AMD Radeon RX 540: 15-20% faster in games, but rarely available for sale.
- Intel Arc A310: A modern alternative with FSR and AV1 support, but more expensive ($120).
Practical Tips
1. Power Supply: A 350-400W PSU with a 6-pin PCIe connector is sufficient.
2. Compatibility:
- PCIe 3.0 x16 (backward compatible with 2.0).
- Recommended for use with processors like Intel Core i3 or Ryzen 3.
3. Drivers: Official AMD support ended in 2022. For Windows 11/12 and Linux, third-party solutions or stable versions from 2021 will be needed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low price ($75-90 for new units).
- Energy efficiency.
- Quiet operation.
Cons:
- Outdated architecture.
- Lack of support for modern technologies (FSR, Ray Tracing).
- Limited memory capacity.
Final Conclusion: Who is the R7 350 640SP suitable for?
This graphics card is a choice for:
1. Office PC owners who need to accelerate image output or work with 2D graphics.
2. Retro gaming enthusiasts building systems to run projects from the 2000s.
3. Budget users looking for a temporary solution before upgrading.
If you’re willing to spend an additional $30-50, consider a used RX 570 or a new Intel Arc A310 — they will offer a significantly better experience. However, in its current conditions, the R7 350 640SP remains a symbol of the “small but loyal” approach to budget builds.
Prices are current as of April 2025. Check availability at official AMD stores and partners.