Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
Samsung Exynos 1380
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2200
and
Samsung Exynos 1380
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2800 MHz (2800 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: February 2023 (January 2022 vs February 2023)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
January 2022
Launch Date
February 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9925
Model Name
S5E8835
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU name
Mali-G68 MP5
810 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
3.1104 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.608 TFLOPS
640
Shading units
-
3
Execution units
5
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 3790 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
7 W
TDP
5 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2200
1594
+58%
Exynos 1380
1008
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2200
3685
+33%
Exynos 1380
2773
FP32 (float)
Exynos 2200
3172
+412%
Exynos 1380
620
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2200
902026
+56%
Exynos 1380
578941
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
5001
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
6329
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
295
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Exynos 1380
280
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
2966
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
808
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
2844
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
Samsung Galaxy M54
Samsung Exynos 1380
17460
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1380)
Samsung Exynos 1380
13227
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
797
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-samsung-exynos-1380" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 1380</a>