Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3000 MHz (3000 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2022 (December 2021 vs January 2022)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
December 2021
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM8450
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3000 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 730
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
818 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
2.5128 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
768
Shading units
640
2
Execution units
3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12.1
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Hexagon
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
5.3 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1664
+4%
Exynos 2200
1594
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
4030
+9%
Exynos 2200
3685
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2462
Exynos 2200
3172
+29%
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1096529
+22%
Exynos 2200
902026
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10505
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
11920
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
790
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
736
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9565
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2548
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10361
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
33310
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
13969
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2539
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-1-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>