Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2500
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (3 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (3200 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2025 (January 2025 vs January 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
January 2025
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
Exynos 2500
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
10
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
4 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
-
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
-
GPU frequency
810 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
640
-
Execution units
3
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
-
TDP
7 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2500
2719
+71%
Exynos 2200
1594
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2500
9016
+145%
Exynos 2200
3685
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2500
2570180
+185%
Exynos 2200
902026
AntuTu 11
Exynos 2500
2289696
+60%
Exynos 2200
1434169
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
19059
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
25095
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Exynos 2500
10527
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4421
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Exynos 2500
1303
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
515
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
10736
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4604
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Exynos 2500
2267
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2342
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
37192
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2500-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>