Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Samsung Exynos 2200 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 3300 MHz (3300 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: October 2023 (October 2023 vs January 2022)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
October 2023
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM8650-AB
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
5x (3x3.2 GHz/2x3.0GHz) – Cortex-A720
2x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3300 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 750
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
770 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
640
-
Execution units
3
3.0 FP
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.1
4K @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Hexagon
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
-
TDP
7 W
ARMv9
Instruction set
ARMv9-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
2192 +38%
Exynos 2200
1594
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
7085 +92%
Exynos 2200
3685
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
1933536 +114%
Exynos 2200
902026

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
19778
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
22529
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Solar Bay
Redmagic Gaming Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
9124
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4421
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Redmagic Gaming Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
955
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
515
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Redmagic Gaming Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
9078
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4604
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Redmagic 9S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
1840
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
1806
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
3DMark Wild Life
Asus ROG Phone 8 / 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
18450
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Asus ROG Phone 8 / 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
5205
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
21026
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Asus ZenFone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
62240
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Lenovo Legion Y700 (2025)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
25201
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
5029
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958