Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3210 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (January 2024 vs January 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
January 2024
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
Exynos 2400
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
640
-
Execution units
3
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.1
-
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
-
TDP
7 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
+30%
Exynos 2200
1594
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
+79%
Exynos 2200
3685
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
+88%
Exynos 2200
902026
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4421
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
515
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
4604
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>