MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (2800 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (September 2023 vs January 2024)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
September 2023
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Model Name
Exynos 2400
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP4
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
-
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
4
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
-
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
MediaTek APU 650
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1125
Exynos 2400
2080
+85%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
2705
Exynos 2400
6582
+143%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
775994
Exynos 2400
1698761
+119%
AntuTu 11
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1003078
Exynos 2400
2046435
+104%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
6190
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
7347
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
467
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
4228
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1179
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-7200-ultra-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>