Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs November 2023)
- Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (2900 MHz vs 3250 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
March 2026
Launch Date
November 2023
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8865
Model Name
Dimensity 9300
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
3250 MHz
-
Transistor count
22.7
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
1300 MHz
-
FLOPS
5.9904 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
-
3.0
OpenCL version
-
1.4
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.1
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5T
-
Memory frequency
9600 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
3.5
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
Dimensity 9300
2225
+63%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
Dimensity 9300
7857
+80%
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1680
1203
Dimensity 9300
6110
+408%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
Dimensity 9300
2032141
+44%
AntuTu 11
Exynos 1680
1390055
Dimensity 9300
2447714
+76%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1884
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
783
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1905
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
16337
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
4724
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
6205
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
18317
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9300" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300</a>