Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 7 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2285 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs May 2025)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
HiSilicon
March 2026
Launch Date
May 2025
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
SMIC
S5E8865
Model Name
Kirin 8020
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.285 GHz, 3x 2.05 GHz, 4x 1.3 GHz
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
7 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2285 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Maleoon 920
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
840 MHz
-
FLOPS
1.7203 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
512
3.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.4
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
-
12.1
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.1
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
-
Memory frequency
4266 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Da Vinci
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
Kirin 8020
1377
+1%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
+25%
Kirin 8020
3499
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1680
1203
Kirin 8020
1686
+40%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
+43%
Kirin 8020
988298
AntuTu 11
Exynos 1680
1390055
+21%
Kirin 8020
1146138
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-hisilicon-kirin-8020" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020</a>