Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
Google Tensor G2
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
Google Tensor G2
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2850 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs October 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Google
March 2026
Launch Date
October 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E8865
Model Name
Tensor G2
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2850 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Mali-G710 MP7
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
-
FLOPS
1.1424 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
96
-
Execution units
7
3.0
OpenCL version
-
1.4
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.1
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
-
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
-
TDP
7 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
+15%
Tensor G2
1188
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
+26%
Tensor G2
3468
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1680
1203
+8%
Tensor G2
1119
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
+71%
Tensor G2
824434
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
723
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
783
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
725
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
6526
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1841
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
6205
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
6726
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1726
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1768
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-google-tensor-g2" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Google Tensor G2</a>