MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
vs
Google Tensor G2
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
and
Google Tensor G2
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2023 (September 2023 vs October 2022)
- Higher Frequency: 2850 MHz (2800 MHz vs 2850 MHz)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Google
September 2023
Launch Date
October 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Model Name
Tensor G2
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
2850 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G710 MP7
-
GPU frequency
850 MHz
-
FLOPS
1.1424 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
96
4
Execution units
7
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
MediaTek APU 650
Neural processor (NPU)
Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1125
Tensor G2
1188
+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
2705
Tensor G2
3468
+28%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
775994
Tensor G2
824434
+6%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
7006
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2
8262
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
6190
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
8943
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
7347
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
10611
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
467
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
723
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
4228
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
6526
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
1179
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1841
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-7200-ultra-vs-google-tensor-g2" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Google Tensor G2</a>