MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
vs
Google Tensor G2
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
and
Google Tensor G2
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (3350 MHz vs 2850 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2023 (November 2023 vs October 2022)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Google
November 2023
Launch Date
October 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 8300 ultra
Model Name
Tensor G2
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
2850 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G615 MP6
GPU name
Mali-G710 MP7
1400 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
-
FLOPS
1.1424 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
96
-
Execution units
7
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
Yes
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4266 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
-
TDP
7 W
-
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
MediaTek APU 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1506
+27%
Tensor G2
1188
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4844
+40%
Tensor G2
3468
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1518170
+84%
Tensor G2
824434
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
10420
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
8943
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
9580
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
10611
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1182
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
723
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1162
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
725
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
9801
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
6526
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
2773
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1841
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
11135
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
6726
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
41915
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
32023
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
13978
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2
11827
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8300-ultra-vs-google-tensor-g2" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra vs Google Tensor G2</a>