MediaTek Dimensity 8100
vs
Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
and
Samsung Exynos 1680
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2850 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2022 vs March 2026)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
March 2022
Launch Date
March 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6895Z/TCZA
Model Name
S5E8865
4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2850 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP6
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 550
860 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
1.309 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
-
Shading units
128
6
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
3.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.4
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5100 Mbps
LTE Cat. 21
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
6.1
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8100
1141
Exynos 1680
1361
+19%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8100
3640
Exynos 1680
4359
+20%
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 8100
1335
+11%
Exynos 1680
1203
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8100
843925
Exynos 1680
1408598
+67%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
615
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5934
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
1612
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5900
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
6205
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
1563
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1726
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8100-vs-samsung-exynos-1680" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Samsung Exynos 1680</a>