MediaTek Dimensity 8100
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (5 nm vs 3 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3730 MHz (2850 MHz vs 3730 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: April 2025 (March 2022 vs April 2025)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
March 2022
Launch Date
April 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
MT6895Z/TCZA
Model Name
MT6991 MT6991Z/TCZA
4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925, 3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4, 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
3 nm
2850 MHz
Frequency
3730 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP6
GPU name
Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
860 MHz
GPU frequency
1612 MHz
1.309 TFLOPS
FLOPS
4.9521 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
128
6
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
3.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 21
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
6.0
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
5333 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 890
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8100
1141
Dimensity 9400 Plus
2956
+159%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8100
3640
Dimensity 9400 Plus
9090
+150%
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 8100
1335
Dimensity 9400 Plus
5002
+275%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8100
843925
Dimensity 9400 Plus
2678086
+217%
AntuTu 11
Dimensity 8100
1092605
Dimensity 9400 Plus
2874956
+163%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
8372
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
18628
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
615
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
2427
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5934
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
18206
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
1612
Vivo X200s
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
5777
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo S15 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5900
Vivo X200T
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
21087
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Realme GT Neo3 150W
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
32365
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
188713
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Realme GT Neo3 150W
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
15366
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
22888
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8100-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9400-plus" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus</a>