MediaTek Helio G95
vs
Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Helio G95
and
Samsung Exynos 1680
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (12 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2050 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (September 2020 vs March 2026)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
September 2020
Launch Date
March 2026
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6785V/CD
Model Name
S5E8865
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
8
12 nm
Technology
4 nm
2050 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G76 MP4
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 550
900 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
0.2592 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
36
Shading units
128
4
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
3.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.4
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 600 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5100 Mbps
LTE Cat. 12
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
No
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
6.1
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
-
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Da Vinci
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio G95
638
Exynos 1680
1361
+113%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio G95
1745
Exynos 1680
4359
+150%
FP32 (float)
Helio G95
254
Exynos 1680
1203
+374%
AnTuTu 10
Helio G95
419438
Exynos 1680
1408598
+236%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Poco M5s
MediaTek Helio G95
177
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Poco M5s
MediaTek Helio G95
1482
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco M5s
MediaTek Helio G95
421
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5s
MediaTek Helio G95
1501
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
6205
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme 8
MediaTek Helio G95
396
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1726
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-helio-g95-vs-samsung-exynos-1680" target="_blank">MediaTek Helio G95 vs Samsung Exynos 1680</a>