Apple A15 Bionic
vs
Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Apple A15 Bionic
and
Samsung Exynos 1680
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3230 MHz (3230 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (September 2021 vs March 2026)
Basic
Apple
Label Name
Samsung
September 2021
Launch Date
March 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
APL1W07
Model Name
S5E8865
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche, 4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
Architecture
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
6
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
3230 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz
15
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Apple A15 GPU
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 550
1338 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
1.7126 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
128
5
Execution units
-
-
OpenCL version
3.0
-
Vulkan version
1.4
2732 x 2048
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
-
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 7500 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5100 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
6.1
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
NVMe
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.5-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Neural Engine
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
A15 Bionic
2333
+71%
Exynos 1680
1361
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
A15 Bionic
5741
+32%
Exynos 1680
4359
FP32 (float)
A15 Bionic
1678
+39%
Exynos 1680
1203
AnTuTu 10
A15 Bionic
1315838
Exynos 1680
1408598
+7%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
3859
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
3DMark Wild Life
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
9445
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
2960
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
11604
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
6205
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
2590
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1726
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/apple-a15-bionic-vs-samsung-exynos-1680" target="_blank">Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1680</a>