Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (January 2024 vs November 2023)
- Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (3210 MHz vs 3250 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2024
Launch Date
November 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2400
Model Name
Dimensity 9300
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
3250 MHz
-
Transistor count
22.7
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
1300 MHz
-
FLOPS
5.9904 TFLOPS
-
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5T
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
9600 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
3.5
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
Dimensity 9300
2225
+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
Dimensity 9300
7857
+19%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
Dimensity 9300
2032141
+20%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
19049
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
18288
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
7801
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
663
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8162
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1884
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1905
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
16337
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
4724
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
18317
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
45132
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
14205
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9300" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300</a>