MediaTek Helio G85
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Helio G85
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (12 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (2000 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (April 2020 vs January 2024)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
April 2020
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Low end
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6769Z
Model Name
Exynos 2400
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
12 nm
Technology
4 nm
2000 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G52 MP2
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1000 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
0.096 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
24
Shading units
-
2
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
-
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.4
5
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
1800 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
2K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
2K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
-
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio G85
416
Exynos 2400
2080
+400%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio G85
1338
Exynos 2400
6582
+392%
AnTuTu 10
Helio G85
275547
Exynos 2400
1698761
+517%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
MediaTek Helio G85
1402
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco C65
MediaTek Helio G85
1732
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Poco C65
MediaTek Helio G85
81
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Wild Life
Motorola Moto G23
MediaTek Helio G85
746
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G23
MediaTek Helio G85
189
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Motorola Moto G24
MediaTek Helio G85
16317
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G24 Power
MediaTek Helio G85
9405
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-helio-g85-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">MediaTek Helio G85 vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>